forums

Mike Greenberg Eviscerates Curby Dumb

Tad Footeball

Tad Footeball

1996 Interim Big East Conference Commissioner
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
19,337
Well as much as Greeny is actually capable of eviscerating anyone.

[video]http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=15048555[/video]
 
Advertisement
I heard it on the radio this morning. Greeny was spot on. I wish Herpes Smart tremendous failure at UGA.
 
This clown and his pseudo-Bama arrogance (that'll end up resembling more Bret Bielema than Nick Saban) will prevent us all from even remotely pulling for UGA based on the goodwill their fanbase may have earned from their positive demeanor toward our hiring of Richt. Oh well. The $EC always gonna $EC.
 
Mark Emmert is full of crap, period. These are student athletes, not school property. If a kid is buried on a depth chart, or plays for a school that's not allowing him to showcase his talent b/c maybe, just maybe, he wants a shot to play at the next level, then why in the world would he not be allowed to play at another school? Why is he allowed to be restricted where he can and can't go? If another school is willing to pick up the tab on a scholly or if that kid is willing to pay out of pocket or work his way to getting another scholly, then why not?

The NCAA needs to be disbanded. On one hand, they trip if a kid gets a visit from a coach during the "dead period", but on the other hand they don't trip if a coach is trying to ruin a kids potential livelihood. On one hand, they trip if a kid gets a meal paid for him by a booster, but on the other hand if a powerful SEC school is providing "discounts" on luxury cars from their faithful boosters, it's all good. On one hand if a school covers up wild parties, shame on u, but if a powerful SEC school covers up numerous sexual assaults, "hey, none of our business, let title IX take care of that.

The inconsistencies of this quasi leadership baffles me and they should be gone.
 
I'm assuming Kirby Dumb was nowhere near that pu$$y when he went in on him.

Is that the same Greenturd who sat on his floppy ****** lips the other day while Rick Pitino ripped the microphone out of his girlish hand and gave a monologue?

He and that fat dopey gimp partner of his couldn't muster the courage to ask Pitino where this rogue $20k/year assistant of his got the $10k to give to the hookers?
 
Rellyrell said:
Mark Emmert is full of crap, period. These are student athletes, not school property. If a kid is buried on a depth chart, or plays for a school that's not allowing him to showcase his talent b/c maybe, just maybe, he wants a shot to play at the next level, then why in the world would he not be allowed to play at another school? Why is he allowed to be restricted where he can and can't go? If another school is willing to pick up the tab on a scholly or if that kid is willing to pay out of pocket or work his way to getting another scholly, then why not?

The NCAA needs to be disbanded. On one hand, they trip if a kid gets a visit from a coach during the "dead period", but on the other hand they don't trip if a coach is trying to ruin a kids potential livelihood. On one hand, they trip if a kid gets a meal paid for him by a booster, but on the other hand if a powerful SEC school is providing "discounts" on luxury cars from their faithful boosters, it's all good. On one hand if a school covers up wild parties, shame on u, but if a powerful SEC school covers up numerous sexual assaults, "hey, none of our business, let title IX take care of that.

The inconsistencies of this quasi leadership baffles me and they should be gone.
Click to expand...

BOOM!

:fistbump:
 
The Franchise said:
I'm assuming Kirby Dumb was nowhere near that pu$$y when he went in on him.

Is that the same Greenturd who sat on his floppy ****** lips the other day while Rick Pitino ripped the microphone out of his girlish hand and gave a monologue?

He and that fat dopey gimp partner of his couldn't muster the courage to ask Pitino where this rogue $20k/year assistant of his got the $10k to give to the hookers?
Click to expand...

MG is a fuge ****got, he takes the popular stance then screams from the mountain tops like he's MR edgie. Cannot stand his ***.

I still don't know how he survived the Martin Luther Coon " accident ". ESPN buried the **** out of that .
 
The Franchise said:
I'm assuming Kirby Dumb was nowhere near that pu$$y when he went in on him.

Is that the same Greenturd who sat on his floppy ****** lips the other day while Rick Pitino ripped the microphone out of his girlish hand and gave a monologue?

He and that fat dopey gimp partner of his couldn't muster the courage to ask Pitino where this rogue $20k/year assistant of his got the $10k to give to the hookers?
Click to expand...

It's funny you rightfully attack Golic too. Notre Dame ties aside, I could never stand that phony either. His Tony Siragusa wannabe Joe Everyman schtick is so obviously phony that it's only masked by the total uselessness of their show as a whole. In relation to Greenberg, I'm willing to ignore the source and just focus on Cur B. Stupid's flaws.
 
Advertisement
Tad Footeball said:
Well as much as Greeny is actually capable of eviscerating anyone.

[video]http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=15048555[/video]
Click to expand...

Been saying this for years! It actually seems illegal and seems similar to the Free Agent situation the courts ruled on many years ago. Why this can't or hasn't been challenged is beyond me. Tell me the difference, coach signs a contract with a university, get millions and can leave for any job he prefers, yet a kid signs a non guaranteed yearly renewable scholarship and the person that can leave can prevent him from choosing where he'd like to continue his athletic and academic career. Hypocrisy and seems an easy legal victory.
 
Man everybody does that ish...who cares...NCAA needs to stop that ish

If you wanna transfer to a lower tier school You are eligible to play next year

If you wanna transfer to another FBS school you have to wait a year...if a school is found tampering with your player they lose 2 scholarships and fined a milly
 
I agree with most of what's already been said. However, nobody has mentioned the real hypocrisy here...

If a player wants to leave a school, transfer to another school and play that sport, they are limited to the schools they can go to and, in most cases, must sit out at least one year.

On the other hand, a coach who recruited players, assistant coaches and took tax payer dollars is allowed to leave and "transfer" to the highest bidder the second a better offer is on the table - no waiting period, no payback, no limitations.

One is deemed problematic and controlled by the NCAA, the other is considered "free market demand" and is 100% allowed by the NCAA. One allows a student athlete to move on to another school/coach/environment for their personal comfort and future, the other allows a paid employee to breach a contract, lie to their fellow coaches and break their recruiting oath to players stating "I will be here for you".

The NCAA doesn't have a problem with coaches leaving behind a program - why is there a problem with student athlete transfers?
 
HurricaneAce07 said:
I agree with most of what's already been said. However, nobody has mentioned the real hypocrisy here...

If a player wants to leave a school, transfer to another school and play that sport, they are limited to the schools they can go to and, in most cases, must sit out at least one year.

On the other hand, a coach who recruited players, assistant coaches and took tax payer dollars is allowed to leave and "transfer" to the highest bidder the second a better offer is on the table - no waiting period, no payback, no limitations.

One is deemed problematic and controlled by the NCAA, the other is considered "free market demand" and is 100% allowed by the NCAA. One allows a student athlete to move on to another school/coach/environment for their personal comfort and future, the other allows a paid employee to breach a contract, lie to their fellow coaches and break their recruiting oath to players stating "I will be here for you".

The NCAA doesn't have a problem with coaches leaving behind a program - why is there a problem with student athlete transfers?
Click to expand...

All excellent points but the only thing that makes it slightly apples to oranges are buyouts and most schools having an unwillingness to enforce actual contracts. That later logic is even hypocritical though because an AD will say that he doesn't want to keep a coach hostage and force someone to be somewhere they don't want to be- which is exactly what they do with kids they to try stop from transferring.
 
The buyout distinction is horrible for several reasons. The main reason is that HCs making millions of dollars are in a better position to pay a pre-bargained buyout than are players making no money.

If they wanted to install a transfer buyout for players based on relative income to HCs, then they could let the players pay a $100 buyout to transfer. I'm sure players who want to leave badly enough would pay that buyout just like HCs do.

Second, most of the time the poaching school either pays the buyout for HC it poaches or greatly assists.
 
Actually, a Player can transfer to ANY college of his choice. The problem is twofold:

(1) Player has to sit out the upcoming/next year

(2) If player chooses a school prohibited by current college, he can't accept a scholarship for the upcoming /next year?


I suggest.

(1) Go to a FCS or JC for a year and then to transfer to college of choice

(2) Sit out a year and train like a beast and then transfer to college of choice
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Easy compromise. Have to sit out a year in a normal case of voluntary transfer request, and coaches can limit schools. However, there should be be no transfer restrictions and can start immediately if the NCAA has opened an investigation (incentive for schools to remain compliant) or if head coach, recruiter of record, or position coach leaves position (fired or gets a new job).
 
The Franchise said:
The buyout distinction is horrible for several reasons. The main reason is that HCs making millions of dollars are in a better position to pay a pre-bargained buyout than are players making no money.

If they wanted to install a transfer buyout for players based on relative income to HCs, then they could let the players pay a $100 buyout to transfer. I'm sure players who want to leave badly enough would pay that buyout just like HCs do.

Second, most of the time the poaching school either pays the buyout for HC it poaches or greatly assists.
Click to expand...

I mentioned it because the buyout factor is part of the reason schools don't protest when say a UiF swoops in and plucks away a coach that just lost to Air Force. Colorado State got cash and sweeteners to let McEltoof walk whereas they get nothing if a kid walks. My point was basically that even when a coach "transfers" to a better job that the system is still rigged many times where the "victim" school still comes out a winner.
 
GrCh Jeep said:
Actually, a Player can transfer to ANY college of his choice. The problem is twofold:

(1) Player has to sit out the upcoming/next year

(2) If player chooses a school prohibited by current college, he can't accept a scholarship for the upcoming /next year?


I suggest.

(1) Go to a FCS or JC for a year and then to transfer to college of choice

(2) Sit out a year and train like a beast and then transfer to college of choice
Click to expand...

Those 2 suggestions... you say that like there isnt a huge risk of doing that and it going horribly wrong, especially of how the JUCO system works. The simple solution and the right solution is just allowing those players to transfer where ever they want. For example even if it was some redshirt popular recruit on Miami and he said i wanna go somewhere else... fine GO idc because i know the bets thing for Miami football is having players who WANT to Canes!! Actually Kiy Hester fits that example cause i would have LOVED to see what he could do for us and he had a very honorable reason for wanting to transfer.
 
Back
Top