Two questions for you:They arent scoring 14 points
41-10, played the pointsTwo questions for you:
1. have you bet the team total under?
2. do you fear garbage time scores?
Boys said that about Louisville last year.Posted elsewhere it looks like their OL is a walking MASH unit apparently. Like 3 starters out and 6-7 OL total out. I’d like to see us with a workman like effort. 48-0.
Posted elsewhere it looks like their OL is a walking MASH unit apparently. Like 3 starters out and 6-7 OL total out. I’d like to see us with a workman like effort. 48-0.
Louisville had weapons at WR and RB and an underrated athletic defense. And we played about as bad a game as you can have….and still should have won.
Agreed, that was the "rat poison" that was referenced not in the locker-room but in the Coach's office. This stubborn insistency regarding the offense not needing to change, no matter how many 8/9 man fronts RBs encountered in the box.a mix of excited but a bit underwhelmed. And even within that score scenario context matters. Are we leading 21-0 and they catch a busted play. Are they driving with us up 14-7 and we get a pick six? Overthinking for sure but what else I got to do? 1st game doesn’t make a trend but you can only look at the results you have.
Last season there were some question marks that got “win-washed” early on. Can’t ignore the irony that we needed to change/open things up to make the playoffs but our ability to run the ball in the end took us to the final. It’s almost like a healthy balance of not being predictable and keeping defenses honest made things work better, but that kind of thinking g was mopey last year.