No lies spoken
He brings up very good points and is probably being generous.
8 straight weeks of games is difficult for any elite roster, let alone a rebuilding one. For context, Clemson's 2d bye is 25 Oct.
Except for last year, how many seasons since 2001 has Miami matched the end of season record with the expected pre-season record?
Zero.
That is also a factor that needs to be considered in tbe body of work.
Agreed.How players and coaches have performed they were in their current positions, including some instances of not even being alive, has absolutely zero bearing on a singular thing for this season.
New team entirely, new expectations, TBD on outcome. Last year means nothing. 2006 means nothing.
The last time I went to Pitt was 2017. I'll be sitting this one outWe don't leave the state of Florida for 8 games so that is a schedule positive.
Also VT stinks so dont think that game is that tough, but Pittsburgh will be good this season. The cold doesnt concern me that is overplayed, Miami is 6-1 in their last 7 trips to Pittsburgh. We actually play very well there.
Yeah that is one team we consistently beat.We don't leave the state of Florida for 8 games so that is a schedule positive.
Also VT stinks so dont think that game is that tough, but Pittsburgh will be good this season. The cold doesnt concern me that is overplayed, Miami is 6-1 in their last 7 trips to Pittsburgh. We actually play very well there.
Didn’t even watch the video but already know everything that was saidWho cares. These predictors or experts never get it right year in and year out.
His computer model spit out 9-3 as the most likely outcome but Pate provided the caveat of the model not considering the impact of a new/upgrade DC and portal talent.So can anyone tell us what the actual prediction was for those that don’t want to watch
6-6 low endSo can anyone tell us what the actual prediction was for those that don’t want to watch
Takes a real genius to throw the law of averages out for schedule results. Add in some mid level commentary regurgitated from others and you have this. Lol.6-6 low end
9-3 Pate
11-1high end
Of course all scenarios above are possible, but what is tbe most realistic given all the data we have to make an informed guesstimate?
The past means nothing, anyone who makes predictions based on the past has no ability to evaluate this team. This team is a new team and I wish people would finally let go of the past and just evaluate this team for what they are, which is a very talented team. Will they do it this year, no one knows until they do but trying to say they won’t do it because a team in 2008 didn’t do it makes no sense.Agreed.
But organizationally it does indicate everything.
Different players, different coaches, different "team" rosters, yet the consistency of underachieving is ever present. Catastrophic atmospheric.
Like yourself and everyone, I want Mario and these players to break that cycle. It's disappointing to even keep having to have the conversation over and over.
Go Canes. Again.
The past means nothing, anyone who makes predictions based on the past has no ability to evaluate this team. This team is a new team and I wish people would finally let go of the past and just evaluate this team for what they are, which is a very talented team. Will they do it this year, no one knows until they do but trying to say they won’t do it because a team in 2008 didn’t do it makes no sense.
Like you need a computer model for that. ****** nerd needs to hit the incline dumbbellsHis computer model spit out 9-3 as the most likely outcome but Pate provided the caveat of the model not considering the impact of a new/upgrade DC and portal talent.