Miami Nights official

[tr1ck]

They should make the midfield U neon and aso the touchdown lettering neon . That would be dope

 

[USNAVYCANE]

Just ordered one

 

[TheOriginalCane]

Jeebus you're dumb, and you make so many assumptions/arguments for me that *eye* am not making. We can find you a padded room so you can talk to yourself in safety, if you'd like. You think you're arguing w/me when really - you're just making up crap, saying I'm saying it, then arguing against the strawmen you're setting up. Are they in the room with us, *right now*, j-j-j-junior? Your first sentence in your post is some hardcore projection!!!

Just take your L and go, man. We will be here laughing at your idiocy.

Sure, sure.

You realize that your ENTIRE argument was:

1. Get mad that somone used an 8-year-old survey which showed adidas having 7% of the interest from recruits
2. Assert that adidas is "comfortably" in second place right now, while providing absolutely no evidence thereof

Hilarious. You want to pretend like you value data analysis so much, while providing no evidence of your own. Got it.

 

[Headhunter]

just bring back the old school shiny orange pants and be done with it

 

[BWCD]

Sure, sure.

You realize that your ENTIRE argument was:

1. Get mad that somone used an 8-year-old survey which showed adidas having 7% of the interest from recruits
2. Assert that adidas is "comfortably" in second place right now, while providing absolutely no evidence thereof

Hilarious. You want to pretend like you value data analysis so much, while providing no evidence of your own. Got it.

1) Had nothing to do with defending Adidas. Had to do with old, out of context data duping dummies like you, dummy. I'm not caping for Adidas nor dissing Nike. Multiple times, I've said this. Cognitive issues have to be such a struggle for you...#thoughtsnprayers.

2) Do you disagree with my assertion/opinion on that? Fine...no skin off my *** if you do, free country (for now). Also, it's an assertion/opinion, and the article that CaneInMD shared is a different kind of analysis (HS recruits opinions vs What schools use which brands), but in general backs up my assertion/opinion. I never presented it as *fact*, nor did I look to just toss out a pie graph to mislead dummies like yourself (which is what I took exception to).

So yet again...fvck off, go argue with a brick wall, pack your knives and go, take a long walk off a short pier, have the mob help you disappear, go play with an alligator in the Everglades...just, Bye Felicia.

 

[Rellyrell]

Thank you. Next time put the facking sources in there the first time - people use dumbass charts like that to mislead people online all the time. I despise it. Good on you for backing it up when called out.

I'm more of an Adidas guy myself, but I don't deny Nike's stranglehold on things - never have. It was more the principle of the data and knowing the source that had my hackles up.

Also note though that those data points are *** EIGHT YEARS OLD *** per your HuffPost article that the chart is from:

"According to the January 2015 report, Nike was the clear favorite with 73 percent of recruits indicating that it was their preferred sports apparel company. Under Armour was second and adidas was third with 16 percent and 7 percent, respectively. A small percentage of recruits entered other brands like New Balance and Reebok as shown in the chart below."

How about these #’s

The Most Popular Sneaker Brands in the World, Ranked

From Nike and Adidas to Vans, Air Jordan, New Balance, and beyond, check out the full rundown of the most popular sneaker brands on earth.

boardroom.tv

Leading footwear brands amongst teenagers U.S. 2025| Statista

This statistic depicts the preferred footwear brands amongst teens in the United States as of spring 2025.

www.statista.com

The Most Popular Shoes And Brands Worn By Players Around The NBA - 2023 Edition - Baller Shoes DB

Click here for the UPDATED 2024 list of the most popular shoes and brands. April 21, 2023 The NBA’s 77th season is well underway, with players showcasing their skills and styles on the court. As always, their choice of footwear remains a topic that’s almost as interesting as the games...

ballershoesdb.com

Top football recruits share their dream NIL brand

On3 surveyed some of the football recruits in the country to find out what their dream NIL deals will be once they are in the college ranks.

www.on3.com

Edit: my **** is never out of date

 

[TheOriginalCane]

1) Had nothing to do with defending Adidas. Had to do with old, out of context data duping dummies like you, dummy. I'm not caping for Adidas nor dissing Nike. Multiple times, I've said this. Cognitive issues have to be such a struggle for you...#thoughtsnprayers.

2) Do you disagree with my assertion/opinion on that? Fine...no skin off my *** if you do, free country (for now). Also, it's an assertion/opinion, and the article that CaneInMD shared is a different kind of analysis (HS recruits opinions vs What schools use which brands), but in general backs up my assertion/opinion. I never presented it as *fact*, nor did I look to just toss out a pie graph to mislead dummies like yourself (which is what I took exception to).

So yet again...fvck off, go argue with a brick wall, pack your knives and go, take a long walk off a short pier, have the mob help you disappear, go play with an alligator in the Everglades...just, Bye Felicia.

You are so full of it. You went full-on road rage on a guy who posted a footnote-free pie chart, and then you went nuts on me for your PERCEPTION that I was duped by it (I was not).

It's not out of context. It's 8 years old. There have been very few significant changes in the college apparel landscape since then. But, hey, thanks for all your concern over ***EIGHT YEARS AGO*** data.

I have no idea what your "assertion/opinion" is. You just seem to be angry that someone did not footnote a post as if they were trying to get it published in an academic journal. More importantly, you have chosen not to address my point (that was ***EIGHT YEARS AGO***) about how newbie UnderArmour pulled ahead of old-timer adidas in the first place.

I get it. You are soooooo concerned with process that you can't even deal with what the data actually says. But, hey, keep up all of your stellar academic fact-checking. I'm sure once we start publishing CIS posts in the Harvard Law Review, it will all pay off.

 

[CaneinBroward]

They should make the midfield U neon and aso the touchdown lettering neon . That would be dope

Play the game under black lights instead of regular lights. No one can see the ball, but the colors would just pop.

 

[McGahee2TheHouse]

You are so full of it. You went full-on road rage on a guy who posted a footnote-free pie chart, and then you went nuts on me for your PERCEPTION that I was duped by it (I was not).

It's not out of context. It's 8 years old. There have been very few significant changes in the college apparel landscape since then. But, hey, thanks for all your concern over ***EIGHT YEARS AGO*** data.

I have no idea what your "assertion/opinion" is. You just seem to be angry that someone did not footnote a post as if they were trying to get it published in an academic journal. More importantly, you have chosen not to address my point (that was ***EIGHT YEARS AGO***) about how newbie UnderArmour pulled ahead of old-timer adidas in the first place.

I get it. You are soooooo concerned with process that you can't even deal with what the data actually says. But, hey, keep up all of your stellar academic fact-checking. I'm sure once we start publishing CIS posts in the Harvard Law Review, it will all pay off.

Pointless to even argue with him any more. The goal posts just will continue to move. First there were no sources. Then the sources are old.

I’ll bet my account he has a problem with @Rellyrell ’s sources also

 

[MDOcane]

in case anyone is interested in buying this miami nights jersey, Adidas online currently has a sale, the jersey is currently 40% off & you cna get an extra 20% off with code "extrasale" $60, opposed to current $130 retail

 

[BWCD]

How about these #’s

The Most Popular Sneaker Brands in the World, Ranked

From Nike and Adidas to Vans, Air Jordan, New Balance, and beyond, check out the full rundown of the most popular sneaker brands on earth.

boardroom.tv

Leading footwear brands amongst teenagers U.S. 2025| Statista

This statistic depicts the preferred footwear brands amongst teens in the United States as of spring 2025.

www.statista.com

The Most Popular Shoes And Brands Worn By Players Around The NBA - 2023 Edition - Baller Shoes DB

Click here for the UPDATED 2024 list of the most popular shoes and brands. April 21, 2023 The NBA’s 77th season is well underway, with players showcasing their skills and styles on the court. As always, their choice of footwear remains a topic that’s almost as interesting as the games...

ballershoesdb.com

Top football recruits share their dream NIL brand

On3 surveyed some of the football recruits in the country to find out what their dream NIL deals will be once they are in the college ranks.

www.on3.com

Edit: my **** is never out of date

RellyRell...I respect you. We've spoken on these threads before and have been cool with each other discussing the facts of everything from what I can recall. I know you know what you're talking about. Again - my issue isn't with saying anything anti-Nike or even pro-Adidas. It was the fact that there was a chart just tossed out there based on 8-year old data that was misleading. From a philosophical and factual standpoint, I agree with everything you just posted. I've got no beef with you at all, and no disagreements factually to argue with you about.

All due respect to you, though - TOC being a whiny dummy who fell for old data on the other hand...that's on him. What you posted doesn't change that.

 

[Rellyrell]

Pointless to even argue with him any more. The goal posts just will continue to move. First there were no sources. Then the sources are old.

I’ll bet my account he has a problem with @Rellyrell ’s sources also

Including 2024 Recruits own words?! Lol.

Nah seriously, what @BWCD said is true. Data changes all the time. UA is a muh fcka non-factor. However, Adidas also have slipped since that time. There’s no more Yeezy powering them. They’ve slipped behind Jordan Brand for the #2. Here’s why that’s a big deal; JB doesn’t market like Nike or Adidas. JB doesn’t have the b-ball or streetwear market share like Nike or Adidas, so the fact that JB has now surpassed Adidas in a 8 yr data point is telling.

 

[BWCD]

More importantly, you have chosen not to address my point (that was ***EIGHT YEARS AGO***) about how newbie UnderArmour pulled ahead of old-timer adidas in the first place.

That's because I don't disagree with you on that point, and I never have, dummy. And I'm not here caping for Adidas...yet again, I have to stress that. You trying to make some kind of "gotcha" point by dogging Adidas doesn't faze me at all man. If anyone needs to give it a rest with something on this thread, it's you with that line of weird-*** logic.

 

[TheOriginalCane]

Pointless to even argue with him any more. The goal posts just will continue to move. First there were no sources. Then the sources are old.

I’ll bet my account he has a problem with @Rellyrell ’s sources also

Yeah, the guy is a certifiable lunative with anger issues.

I thought Mr. Data Analysis would at least acknowledge that the data has not changed, or else provide evidence for HIS claims. I was wrong.

I guess we need an annual survey to prove that Nike is #1 each year, otherwise the information is subject to "data creep"...

 

[Shooter McGavin]

1) Had nothing to do with defending Adidas. Had to do with old, out of context data duping dummies like you, dummy. I'm not caping for Adidas nor dissing Nike. Multiple times, I've said this. Cognitive issues have to be such a struggle for you...#thoughtsnprayers.

2) Do you disagree with my assertion/opinion on that? Fine...no skin off my *** if you do, free country (for now). Also, it's an assertion/opinion, and the article that CaneInMD shared is a different kind of analysis (HS recruits opinions vs What schools use which brands), but in general backs up my assertion/opinion. I never presented it as *fact*, nor did I look to just toss out a pie graph to mislead dummies like yourself (which is what I took exception to).

So yet again...fvck off, go argue with a brick wall, pack your knives and go, take a long walk off a short pier, have the mob help you disappear, go play with an alligator in the Everglades...just, Bye Felicia.

Imagine losing your *** over someone posting a ******* pie chart. Unhinged fool you are. You could be gone.

 

[TheOriginalCane]

That's because I don't disagree with you on that point, and I never have, dummy. And I'm not here caping for Adidas...yet again, I have to stress that. You trying to make some kind of "gotcha" point by dogging Adidas doesn't faze me at all man. If anyone needs to give it a rest with something on this thread, it's you with that line of weird-*** logic.

So then you're just mad that a guy didn't footnote and annotate a pie chart in a manner sufficient for academic publication...

Got it...

 

[BWCD]

Pointless to even argue with him any more. The goal posts just will continue to move. First there were no sources. Then the sources are old.

I’ll bet my account he has a problem with @Rellyrell ’s sources also

Right. You should have given your source with that chart, and you shouldn't be surprised someone called you out for old data. Spare me the outrage that you got called on it. Use better data next time.


So...about your account. See my last post to RellyRell.

RellyRell...I respect you. We've spoken on these threads before and have been cool with each other discussing the facts of everything from what I can recall. I know you know what you're talking about. Again - my issue isn't with saying anything anti-Nike or even pro-Adidas. It was the fact that there was a chart just tossed out there based on 8-year old data that was misleading. From a philosophical and factual standpoint, I agree with everything you just posted. I've got no beef with you at all, and no disagreements factually to argue with you about.

All due respect to you, though - TOC being a whiny dummy who fell for old data on the other hand...that's on him. What you posted doesn't change that.

@McGahee2TheHouse When you leaving? Need help packing? Or will YOU move the goalposts on that?

 

[TheOriginalCane]

RellyRell...I respect you. We've spoken on these threads before and have been cool with each other discussing the facts of everything from what I can recall. I know you know what you're talking about. Again - my issue isn't with saying anything anti-Nike or even pro-Adidas. It was the fact that there was a chart just tossed out there based on 8-year old data that was misleading. From a philosophical and factual standpoint, I agree with everything you just posted. I've got no beef with you at all, and no disagreements factually to argue with you about.

All due respect to you, though - TOC being a whiny dummy who fell for old data on the other hand...that's on him. What you posted doesn't change that.

Hilarious.

"Poster A - I am going to flatter you and agree with you in a ridiculous attempt to make it seem like I am a reasonable person who is not-at-all unhinged or angry..."

"Poster B - I am going to continue to attack you for unknown reasons, because I cannot possibly admit that I ****ed up and overreacted..."

Meanwhile, Poster A and Poster B are completely in agreement with one another.

You can't make this **** up.

 

[McGahee2TheHouse]

Right. You should have given your source with that chart, and you shouldn't be surprised someone called you out for old data. Spare me the outrage that you got called on it. Use better data next time.


So...about your account. See my last post to RellyRell.

@McGahee2TheHouse When you leaving? Need help packing? Or will YOU move the goalposts on that?

Lmao. Dude I literally acknowledged that it was old after you pointed it out and said that was all I could find at that moment. My next point was that Nike remains on top, which is backed up by sources since posted.

Why are you still crying about the chart being old? We dealt with this pages ago man.

Old chart, new chart. Nike remains on top. I don’t think we disagree on that.

 

[BWCD]

Yeah, the guy is a certifiable lunative with anger issues.

I thought Mr. Data Analysis would at least acknowledge that the data has not changed, or else provide evidence for HIS claims. I was wrong.

I guess we need an annual survey to prove that Nike is #1 each year, otherwise the information is subject to "data creep"...

Data hasn't changed where Nike is concerned. Still #1. Never said anything to the contrary.

Also, I gave my own assertions as opinions. If I stated something as fact, I'd be backing it up with links or referring to links in this thread already posted backing me up (as I did earlier).

So then you're just mad that a guy didn't footnote and annotate a pie chart in a manner sufficient for academic publication...

Got it...

More so felt the need to call someone out for just posting a pie chart w/o context to confuse dummies like yourself who wouldn't bother to ask "what's the data/source" behind that?