Miami lands another 2026 OL Prospect in Rhys Woodrow

[GOCANES05]

Stanford can’t recruit just anyone, so this is a good sign he’s highly academically

View attachment 326210

That’s an OL , no way come on he has the size and looks of a something surely no a DI OL anything geeez REALLY

 

[Rellyrell]

Fair enough. I concede there are no 3 stars in that list. My point was the guy knows how to build great college offensive lines and evaluate NFLers. I don't see how that changes from Bama to Oregon to Miami. You can make the argument it was Saban and access to better talent. But then Skeeter's evidence kicks in. Over a decade of great OL, by hook or by crook, is more than enough evidence to me.

B4 I respond to both u & @skeeter, there’s two ?’s I want to get clear since this discussion is in the thread of a 0* project:

1. Define “building?” Does this mean recruiting & coaching, recruiting only, or coaching only? Does this mean evaluating at the HS level, HS level and Portal, or Portal?

2. Are u suggesting we r to blindly trust evaluations for any prospects recruited?

 

[JHallCanes]

B4 I respond to both u & @skeeter, there’s two ?’s I want to get clear since this discussion is in the thread of a 0* project:

1. Define “building?” Does this mean recruiting & coaching, recruiting only, or coaching only? Does this mean evaluating at the HS level, HS level and Portal, or Portal?

2. Are u suggesting we r to blindly trust evaluations for any prospects recruited?

 

[Rellyrell]

I’m just patiently waiting for the parameters of what “building” means, b/c I know what it actually means, but just need to know CIS’ definitions.

 

[ageezy]

@cway313 has never pumped sunshine ... not sure why yall expect him to change his stripes ... kyp

 

[cway313]

@cway313 has never pumped sunshine ... not sure what yall expect he im to change his stripes ... kyp

Or stop making up **** and pretending it's factual. I know what not to expect though .

 

[grover]

I’ve been going back and forth with skeeter for a decade or two ever since Shadow’s old board. He’s his own man so I won’t speak for him.And since it’s his debate with you I’ll stay out of it. I already conceded you two were arguing over something different than the post I added about Mario’s success as an OL coach et Bama..

 

[TrumpyCane]

Outside of 2022 Miami’s offensive line has been good/great under Mario

Trumpycane wants to know who gives a **** if the line had 5 3* or 5 5*

 

[skeeter]

B4 I respond to both u & @skeeter, there’s two ?’s I want to get clear since this discussion is in the thread of a 0* project:

1. Define “building?” Does this mean recruiting & coaching, recruiting only, or coaching only? Does this mean evaluating at the HS level, HS level and Portal, or Portal?

2. Are u suggesting we r to blindly trust evaluations for any prospects recruited?

I was golfing and busy all day so didn’t read all of these

But for OL?

I’d say pretty much yes until otherwise proven wrong

The man is on a streak of I believe 6 out of 7 yrs (besides yr 1 Miami) of fielding very strong OL

Of course we all have our own opinions and recruits we like better than others. I get it

But all this negstivity about a kid that that CMC/Mirabal liked enough to take in May junior year is just mind-boggling to me.

But all this “staff isn’t serious” and saying respecting their OL eye is a “hot take” is just ridiculous to me.

 

[Confidence1000]

Well I eat Dark, Brown, and White meat as long as it's big n juicy.

Go Canes

@Paranos she ain’t fat she THICK! I’ll smash her

 

[Confidence1000]

I feel more would hit if developed. I just feel it's to much development needed for my taste right now. I'm not a huge fan. I feel like I like him more as a developing dt. I like the wrestling traits n size at dt

U like the size huh?

Big Pause

 

[Rellyrell]

I was golfing and busy all day so didn’t read all of these

But for OL?

I’d say pretty much yes until otherwise proven wrong

The man is on a streak of I believe 6 out of 7 yrs (besides yr 1 Miami) of fielding very strong OL

Of course we all have our own opinions and recruits we like better than others. I get it

But all this negstivity about a kid that that CMC/Mirabal liked enough to take in May junior year is just mind-boggling to me.

But all this “staff isn’t serious” and saying respecting their OL eye is a “hot take” is just ridiculous to me.

U didn’t answer my question ?, which I appreciate u golfing & all. We’re in this thread having this discussion for a particular reason.

So what is “building?”

 

[Paranos]

I remember Boone for getting destroyed by Miami Northwestern in a State Championship game.

That was a big ask for any High School team to keep pace with that 2008 MNW squad.



Go Canes

 

[bdcane4eva]

U didn’t answer my question ?, which I appreciate u golfing & all. We’re in this thread having this discussion for a particular reason.

So what is “building?”

Building to CIS is 6-7 to 8-5 to 10-3 then rinse repeat that ****. "But we won 10, we building bro!"
Oh and my new fave: building to CIS is..."we just need to be average, bro".

 

[cway313]

Building to CIS is 6-7 to 8-5 to 10-3 then rinse repeat that ****. "But we won 10, we building bro!"
Oh and my new fave: building to CIS is..."we just need to be average, bro".

 

[skeeter]

U didn’t answer my question ?, which I appreciate u golfing & all. We’re in this thread having this discussion for a particular reason.

So what is “building?”

I did answer your 1st question…I said yes

As for "building" did I use that word? Or did another poster. And why does it matter? Sounds like semantics to me.

Put a strong OL on the field…Plain and simple. Does that qualify for "building"?

And CMC/Mirabal always do that.

1. Define “building?” Does this mean recruiting & coaching, recruiting only, or coaching only? Does this mean evaluating at the HS level, HS level and Portal, or Portal?

Yes… the whole shootin' match. Put a good OL on the field. And they have always done it. With 3* as part of their OLs

 

[cway313]

I did answer your 1st question…I said yes

As for "building" did I use that word? Or did another poster. And why does it matter? Sounds like semantics to me.

Put a strong OL on the field…Plain and simple. Does that qualify for "building"?

And CMC/Mirabal always do that.



Yes… the whole shootin' match. Put a good OL on the field. And they have always done it. With 3* as part of their OLs

The bar has moved so far from the initial post that this has grown exhausting. The OP was "Mario is like Hartline with evals". I think we are best just wishing this guy the best and moving on.

 

[skeeter]

The bar has moved so far from the initial post that this has grown exhausting. The OP was "Mario is like Hartline with evals". I think we are best just wishing this guy the best and moving on.

Nah my initial post here was that CMC/Mirabal fielding **** good OLs with multiple 3* on them was called a “hot take”

That’s clearly BS and why i commented.

 

[cway313]

Nah my initial post here was that CMC/Mirabal fielding **** good OLs with multiple 3* on them was called a “hot take”

That’s clearly BS and why i commented.

I'm guessing this is your alt account.

 

[DMoney]

The bar has moved so far from the initial post that this has grown exhausting. The OP was "Mario is like Hartline with evals". I think we are best just wishing this guy the best and moving on.

I think you are making this more complicated than it is.

Kind of like the other thread "debunking" that Mirabal was a better developer than Searels. We know how that turned out: Cantwell chose Miami over Georgia, he cited Mirabal as the biggest reason, Georgia fans want Searels fired, and everybody in America is picking Miami's 2025 OL over Georgia's.

Mirabal's evaluations get deference because he consistently builds excellent offensive lines. He usually does it with a mix of five-stars like Cantwell and three-stars like Woodrow. This class fits in with what Mirabal usually does, with great success.