NC_Canes_11
All American
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2017
- Messages
- 20,958
There is no “help perspective.” There is no database that the government can’t access. We just had banks and telephone companies give up data without even being subpoenaed for it. They just handed it over bc they supported what was going on. There is no privacy. So we shouldn’t be giving any agency the ability to gather anymore info than they already do, without at least having to work for it, or having to go through improper channels that once found out, will make them look like the crooks they are.That's exactly why it has to come from a help perspective, not a law enforcement perspective. It should be part of a more comprehensive data protection bill. The problem is that one party will put in enough loopholes to weaken the whole thing for their side. Look at the EU's GDPR requirements. You can basically have your data erased with a few exceptions. Nobody's even suggested that here. It's too valuable as a political tool and a corporate tool.
This leads to you walking up to the gun store counter, and them saying, “oh I’m sorry sir, your Google search has been flagged. Here’s a 100 page apology and appeal form. Please turn it in and your case will be heard in 12-24 months.”