- Joined
- Apr 26, 2016
- Messages
- 8,750
Yes, when McCarthy was right shows up, you know the brush is extremely broad.Might as well lock this one up too..
I thought cancel culture (blacklisting) was bad, I guess it depends on who's doing the canceling.
Yes, when McCarthy was right shows up, you know the brush is extremely broad.Might as well lock this one up too..
Don't kill the thread, don't kill the thread, don't kill the threadYes, when McCarthy was right shows up, you know the brush is extremely broad.
I thought cancel culture (blacklisting) was bad, I guess it depends on who's doing the canceling.
A little on fentanyl and on prescriptions drugs...
CNN's owner literally called his own ministry 'the leader in news to the left'. But keep going... we do take you seriously.You know you can't cite good ole Tucker. Fox's own lawyers stated no "reasonable viewer" takes the primetime host Tucker Carlson seriously. lol
https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9
Everyone knows CNN and MSNBC go to the left and Fox goes to the right. Now, when they state that no reasonable viewer can take one of their hosts seriously, I won't link to those hosts either.CNN's owner literally called his own ministry 'the leader in news to the left'. But keep going... we do take you seriously.
OK so I looked it up... Statements made by a lawyer in court during a defamation suit?! Lol.Everyone knows CNN and MSNBC go to the left and Fox goes to the right. Now, when they state that no reasonable viewer can take one of their hosts seriously, I won't link to those hosts either.
You didn't have to look very far. I included a link in that post. Yes, it was a statement the "Fox" lawyer made to the court as a defense in the slander case regarding Tucker Carlson.OK so I looked it up... Statements made by a lawyer in court during a defamation suit?! Lol.
You'd think Rupert Murdoch had said his network was the "the leader in news to the right".
Don't, wouldn't, won't watch Fox news. But carry on...Do you need Rupert Murdoch to tell you that Fox News takes a slant to the right? Come on, you're smarter than that.
One America News or News Max?Don't, wouldn't, won't watch Fox news. But carry on...
So don’t trust the #1 cable news show because the Fox News lawyers were smart enough to figure out how to get a case thrown out?!? Gotcha!You know you can't cite good ole Tucker. Fox's own lawyers stated no "reasonable viewer" takes the primetime host Tucker Carlson seriously. lol
https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9
They stated in a court of law that his show cannot be trusted by a reasonable person. So, he got out of being found guilty for slander at the price of throwing his credibility out the window. Sure, he is the modern day Walter Cronkite. lolSo don’t trust the #1 cable news show because the Fox News lawyers were smart enough to figure out how to get a case thrown out?!? Gotcha!
Btw, watch da video … good stuff about big pharma in there… even a reasonable viewer might think so!
That stuff doesn't get released at times. I dont think the Columbine things were publicly released at full length, only edited in documentaries.Pretty much standard procedure to take down Internet stuff posted by mass killers, no? That's been happening for years.
They stated in a court of law that his show cannot be trusted by a reasonable person. So, he got out of being found guilty for slander at the price of throwing his credibility out the window. Sure, he is the modern day Walter Cronkite. lol
Here's Cronkite, Jr. talking about tanning your balls to increase your testosterone.
https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-********-tanning-misleading-health-experts-1698978
He is because he polarizes for making ridiculous takes that become a lot of attention. Its like Stephen A Smith and Skip Bayless, its the same technique, just different fields.He's not #1 in cable news for no reason
Even in Germany Tucker is #1... who knew?!?He is because he polarizes for making ridiculous takes that become a lot of attention. Its like Stephen A Smith and Skip Bayless, its the same technique, just different fields.
Okay we can have a serious conversation about it or we can just leave it, but stop laughing about every point of view that isn't yours, makes you less of a prick.Even in Germany Tucker is #1... who knew?!?
You made a blanket statement about Tucker making ridiculous statements with no proof. Go ahead and share what makes Tucker #1. I don't watch him every night and only listen when I'm exercising on the bike, so maybe I've missed the ridiculousness. And I only started listening periodically for less than a year now. But most of the time his monologue is good and informative.Okay we can have a serious conversation about it or we can just leave it, but stop laughing about every point of view that isn't yours, makes you less of a prick.
Fox lawyers made a clear statement about him. As much as you want to laugh about it, dragging your "#1 guy on cable" into the mud by saying that every single one of his points should be expressed with reasonable amounts of skeptism is not a common strategy to prevent your network from a damage payment.You made a blanket statement about Tucker making ridiculous statements with no proof
I did. He makes headlines by saying outlandish and ridiculous things, overdramatizing them in order to make people watch and click the network. He is a money machine for Fox.Go ahead and share what makes Tucker #1
Well, again, I have differing points from you and that makes me a prick. Alright.It is funny that you are calling me a prick, when your posts show your true colors on the daily.
Well, no.And I only started listening periodically for less than a year now. But most of the time his monologue is good and informative
Fox lawyers made a clear statement about him. As much as you want to laugh about it, dragging your "#1 guy on cable" into the mud by saying that every single one of his points should be expressed with reasonable amounts of skeptism is not a common strategy to prevent your network from a damage payment.
There was also a time where he said a black person from the upper-middle-class cant experience racism:
Or the time he spoke about the metric system:
I did. He makes headlines by saying outlandish and ridiculous things, overdramatizing them in order to make people watch and click the network. He is a money machine for Fox.
Well, again, I have differing points from you and that makes me a prick. Alright.
Not that I have a problem with being a prick, I am one, but its not that. Sorry.
Well, no.