OriginalGatorHater
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
- Messages
- 16,956
235 out of 65 million is a **** of alot better than 20,000 out of 330 million.So 235 out of 65 million is acceptable? Why not ban knives too so you can have a perfect utopia.
235 out of 65 million is a **** of alot better than 20,000 out of 330 million.So 235 out of 65 million is acceptable? Why not ban knives too so you can have a perfect utopia.
Must’ve been Federalist 86 where Madison said “everything I write should be taken literally from now until the end of time”
Fair enough. I disagree with your interpretation of 2, though. Let’s, then, disband every branch of the military, give every citizen an m16 and 1,000 rounds, and spend the remaining 800.9 billion on other worthwhile ventures. That way we’d at least be following a strict/narrow interpretation of the actual document.The 2nd amendment is about citizenry arming itself so the government does not have a monopoly on force, and enslave it.
You, along with plenty of other people might think that’s funny, but the DC sniper shut down an entire city. The Dallas cop shooters did the same thing. No government in the world, including ours, could fend off an insurgence from 50 million people.
Again… my point is that people are actively trying to work on this problem. It is not being ignored. If we want to play this game… google malaria mortality worldwide… or heart disease mortality in the US. Just because the mortality is high, doesn’t mean that people aren’t aware of the problem and aren’t devoting significant resources trying to resolve it.LOL should have known was flying thru the thread quick.
google traffic fatalities from the summer of 2020
Among people that agree with you?There is no serious legitimate debate on purpose of 2A.
This isn’t a genuine comment bc it makes zero sense. It’s about our citizens and our government. Has zero to do with protecting against foreign actorsFair enough. I disagree with your interpretation of 2, though. Let’s, then, disband every branch of the military, give every citizen an m16 and 1,000 rounds, and spend the remaining 800.9 billion on other worthwhile ventures. That way we’d at least be following a strict/narrow interpretation of the actual document.
Other developed countries that don't have the same gun violence prove that gun control works. It's a fact.
Kinda what the Swiss do, by force of law. Works for them.Fair enough. I disagree with your interpretation of 2, though. Let’s, then, disband every branch of the military, give every citizen an m16 and 1,000 rounds, and spend the remaining 800.9 billion on other worthwhile ventures. That way we’d at least be following a strict/narrow interpretation of the actual document.
Yes a teacher/ teachers have a much higher chance of fighting back against a person with a knife than a gun. You disagree?In an elementary school?
0.000003615384615% vs 0.000060422960725%235 out of 65 million is a **** of alot better than 20,000 out of 330 million.
No but you are ok with multiple school shootings because "I have rights"So 235 out of 65 million is acceptable? Why not ban knives too so you can have a perfect utopia.
Is this really the argument you want to have?Yes a teacher/ teachers have a much higher chance of fighting back against a person with a knife than a gun. You disagree?
Among anyone who can read and understand.Among people that agree with you?
No but you are ok with multiple school shootings because "I have rights"
Or in easier to read terms over 17x less murders per capita.0.000003615384615% vs 0.000060422960725%
Your right.
It does make sense - see Switzerland.This isn’t a genuine comment bc it makes zero sense. It’s about our citizens and our government. Has zero to do with protecting against foreign actors
Read and understand, what?Among anyone who can read and understand.
Quick search 1996 had 84 vs 2015 32.Out of curiosity, how many firearm homicides did they have before they banned guns? I would imagine it was pretty low but I honestly have no idea.
Lol. I just mentioned the Swiss in a reply to someone else.Kinda what the Swiss do, by force of law. Works for them.