forums

Off-Topic Mass killings

Advertisement
Suhrthing said:
The British Army thought that about revolutionary farmers and their muskets as well, didn't they? And you shouldn't assume every servicemen/women would turn on their fellow countrymen.
Click to expand...
Do you like horses? Horse racing by any chance? The Kentucky Derby winner this year was a really long long shot to win. Just bc an 80-1 pony came in I am not going to try and sell you on the long shots coming in on the regular. Dont try to sell me on you and your church league softball team beating the us army.
 
Roncaneefc said:
Hmmm the tyrannical government reason.
If you/we ever have to fight off tyranny we have already lost and the guns will be useless,
Click to expand...
Hmmm the guns are useless against the government reason. If you/we ever have to fight off tyranny why not just rollover.

WOLVERINES!
 
imurcane said:
Do you like horses? Horse racing by any chance? The Kentucky Derby winner this year was a really long long shot to win. Just bc an 80-1 pony came in I am not going to try and sell you on the long shots coming in on the regular. Dont try to sell me on you and your church league softball team beating the us army.
Click to expand...
1654266709495.webp

You see them? That's the Taliban sitting in the presidential palace, this was two weeks before the US had even fully limped out of Afghanistan.

Do you have any idea how many Americans have been taught by the US military in insurgency and non-conventional warfare; on top of all those trained in conventional warfare that are not in the service an longer?

I don't think you're as informed as your think yourself to be.
 
imurcane said:
Do you like horses? Horse racing by any chance? The Kentucky Derby winner this year was a really long long shot to win. Just bc an 80-1 pony came in I am not going to try and sell you on the long shots coming in on the regular. Dont try to sell me on you and your church league softball team beating the us army.
Click to expand...
Again, it wouldn't be skirmish lines, it would be an insurgency.
 
BenicioDelToro said:
Hmmm the guns are useless against the government reason. If you/we ever have to fight off tyranny why not just rollover.

WOLVERINES!
Click to expand...
Who in the US can really claim with legit reasons that our government has been tyrannical? Are there any people groups in the US that should have in our short history tried to over throw the government the way those January 6 terrorists did?
 
Suhrthing said:
View attachment 188264
You see them? That's the Taliban sitting in the presidential palace, this was two weeks before the US had even fully limped out of Afghanistan.

Do you have any idea how many Americans have been taught by the US military in insurgency and non-conventional warfare; on top of all those trained in conventional warfare that are not in the service an longer?

I don't think you're as informed as your think yourself to be.
Click to expand...

Do you? That is the bigger question.
 
Advertisement
Our country needs to clarify what a well regulated militia is. The most recent shooters belonged to which well regulated militia? Common sense people. Common sense.
 
Advertisement
imurcane said:
Our country needs to clarify what a well regulated militia is. The most recent shooters belonged to which well regulated militia? Common sense people. Common sense.
Click to expand...
1654269774066.png



"In colonial times the term ‘well regulated’ meant ‘well functioning’ ― for this was the meaning of those words at that time, as demonstrated by the following passage from the original 1789 charter of the University of North Carolina: ‘Whereas in all well regulated governments it is the indispensable duty of every Legislatures to consult the happiness of a rising generation…’ Moreover the Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘regulated’ among other things as ‘properly disciplined;’ and it defines ‘discipline’ among other things as ‘a trained condition.’"
 
Last edited:
imurcane said:
A well regulated militia is absolutely unnecessary today in the USA. By the way, what well regulated militias have the most recent shooters been a part of?
Click to expand...
Reprint from my post in Roe...

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Perfectly clear the way it is written.

The root unit for presentation of forces of all militia [then and today] is the armed individual. The militia portion has no bearing on meaning of 2A and is used as an argument by those that want to curtail/eliminate the right.
 
Back
Top