Mark is the wrong coach

get wayyy the fk outta here with the bolded.

is that what we need in Miami right now? a nice clean program lmao

we just want to be good enough to win the coastal and get to the ACC championship game?
so now we are trying to back our way into the playoffs by lucking out and winning an easy conference?

my how times have changed

considering our recent history with the ncaa, yeah, it's probably in our best interest to stay out of trouble for a while.

i dont know about you but I dont give a flying fk about an honest clean program. i want to get back to winning.
you know how many programs have gotten in trouble with the ncaa? a ****load. and they have gotten in more trouble than we did.

why do we have to be the ones to act like our main priority is to run a clean honest program? in other words you are saying our main priority is not winning.

its not that serious, our ncaa troubles were overblown. for godsakes we only lost 9 fkin scholarships and missed a chance to back our way into winning the acc coastal wooptee fkin doo.

You have no ****ing business using the term "we".

eat a dk. when i say '"we" i am talking about the real Miami Hurricanes...not this new sissified sht we got going on now where everybody would lose their mind and have a parade if we won the coastal.

Living in the past I see. hahahah Fappin' to his 87' program from the game. Sad little man.
 
Advertisement
Bull****. Do you think it's easier to win a national championship at Georgia or UM??? If you say UGA turn in your Cane card. UGA might be in the top twenty in terms of CFB jobs in terms of having a shot to win the NC, but UM is in the top five. ANY coach should win more games at UM than they would at UGA. Partly becuase of the level of competition UGA faces in the SEC, but more so because a good coach at UM has the most fertile recruting grounds in the country. Put Butch Davis at UGA, and he's winning 6-7 games a year.

so which one is it? people are always complaining that SEC teams have so many resources and we cant compete and its not like it used to be and we have to lower our expectations. we dont have facilities and bla bla bla now your telling me its easier to win at miami than georgia? make up yall mind. i guess it depends on whatever fits your story.

butch wins 6-7 a year at UGA? hahahaha ur funny. u either a comedian or someone who doesnt know what theyre talking about. butch was racking 8 win seasons at fkin UNC and your telling me he is only good for 6 or 7 at georgia lmao who do u think he is al golden?

He was playing Duke, UVA, Wake Forest, Maryland, etc at UNC. And always 4 patsies out of conference. Larry Fedora is doing better at UNC. Sorry, but Butch doesn't come close to the success at UGA that he had here. Like I said, if you think it's easier to win NC at UGA than UM turn in your Canes card. The facts prove it's easier here. We have won five to UGAs two. Then again, math and analysis don't seem to be your strong suit so I doubt you'll get that concept.

Your clueless man. duke uva wake forest is in the same class as UNC. your acting like he was coaching at Miami, fsu, vatech, clemson or something.

u are seriously trying to compare UNC to Georgia? You are telling me that a coach would win more games at UNC than at Georgia? your not the brightest person.

just cuz we won 5 to UGA's 2 means that it is easier to win here? that stat is meaningless. Minnesota has 6 national championships, so does that mean its easier to win at Minnesota than at Georgia and Miami because they have more championships?

Horse****. UVA is .500 in their history and Duke and Wake WAY below .500, while UNC dominated the ACC for years and has a .562 all time wining %. Not even close to being in the same class. UNC is as strong relative to the ACC as UGA is to the SEC. In the 15 years prior to hiring Mark Richt UGA won 10 games only twice. TWICE. In 15 years. UNC won tens games 3 times over the same time frame. That's because of the level of competition. And by the way Davis average season at UNC was 7-6. Fedora has done a better job. 8-5. UNC improved after he left. And the real question isn't ****ing UNC relative to UGA but UM relative to UGA, but your stupid *** doesn't even realize that despite the fact that I've said it twice. You really are a moron. In the first half of the 20th century it would have been easier to win a NC at Minnesota. They were an elite program in the CFB world. That world has changed. You are comparing apples and oranges. UM is still a plum opportunity. Clearly a better place to win NC in the last thirty years than UGA. But don't burn out the 2 watt circuit in your head trying to figure that out.

LMAOO!!!! stopped reading right there. what are you smoking son? UNC dominated the ACC for years?? haha what planet have you been on. And then your touting a .562 winning percentage like thats supposed to be impressive??

are you serious or are you just trolling?

my man, calm down put down the joint and the liquor. wake up in the morning then reread and fix all that dumb sht u just wrote.
 
so which one is it? people are always complaining that SEC teams have so many resources and we cant compete and its not like it used to be and we have to lower our expectations. we dont have facilities and bla bla bla now your telling me its easier to win at miami than georgia? make up yall mind. i guess it depends on whatever fits your story.

butch wins 6-7 a year at UGA? hahahaha ur funny. u either a comedian or someone who doesnt know what theyre talking about. butch was racking 8 win seasons at fkin UNC and your telling me he is only good for 6 or 7 at georgia lmao who do u think he is al golden?

He was playing Duke, UVA, Wake Forest, Maryland, etc at UNC. And always 4 patsies out of conference. Larry Fedora is doing better at UNC. Sorry, but Butch doesn't come close to the success at UGA that he had here. Like I said, if you think it's easier to win NC at UGA than UM turn in your Canes card. The facts prove it's easier here. We have won five to UGAs two. Then again, math and analysis don't seem to be your strong suit so I doubt you'll get that concept.

Your clueless man. duke uva wake forest is in the same class as UNC. your acting like he was coaching at Miami, fsu, vatech, clemson or something.

u are seriously trying to compare UNC to Georgia? You are telling me that a coach would win more games at UNC than at Georgia? your not the brightest person.

just cuz we won 5 to UGA's 2 means that it is easier to win here? that stat is meaningless. Minnesota has 6 national championships, so does that mean its easier to win at Minnesota than at Georgia and Miami because they have more championships?

Horse****. UVA is .500 in their history and Duke and Wake WAY below .500, while UNC dominated the ACC for years and has a .562 all time wining %. Not even close to being in the same class. UNC is as strong relative to the ACC as UGA is to the SEC. In the 15 years prior to hiring Mark Richt UGA won 10 games only twice. TWICE. In 15 years. UNC won tens games 3 times over the same time frame. That's because of the level of competition. And by the way Davis average season at UNC was 7-6. Fedora has done a better job. 8-5. UNC improved after he left. And the real question isn't ****ing UNC relative to UGA but UM relative to UGA, but your stupid *** doesn't even realize that despite the fact that I've said it twice. You really are a moron. In the first half of the 20th century it would have been easier to win a NC at Minnesota. They were an elite program in the CFB world. That world has changed. You are comparing apples and oranges. UM is still a plum opportunity. Clearly a better place to win NC in the last thirty years than UGA. But don't burn out the 2 watt circuit in your head trying to figure that out.

LMAOO!!!! stopped reading right there. what are you smoking son? UNC dominated the ACC for years?? haha what planet have you been on. And then your touting a .562 winning percentage like thats supposed to be impressive??

are you serious or are you just trolling?

my man, calm down put down the joint and the liquor. wake up in the morning then reread and fix all that dumb sht u just wrote.

I'm not touting UNC as a huge powerhouse. But Butch's winnning % there is lower than that all time UNC winning % your cracking jokes about. He kind of failed there buddy. And that's your guy.
 
considering our recent history with the ncaa, yeah, it's probably in our best interest to stay out of trouble for a while.

i dont know about you but I dont give a flying fk about an honest clean program. i want to get back to winning.
you know how many programs have gotten in trouble with the ncaa? a ****load. and they have gotten in more trouble than we did.

why do we have to be the ones to act like our main priority is to run a clean honest program? in other words you are saying our main priority is not winning.

its not that serious, our ncaa troubles were overblown. for godsakes we only lost 9 fkin scholarships and missed a chance to back our way into winning the acc coastal wooptee fkin doo.

You have no ****ing business using the term "we".

eat a dk. when i say '"we" i am talking about the real Miami Hurricanes...not this new sissified sht we got going on now where everybody would lose their mind and have a parade if we won the coastal.

Living in the past I see. hahahah Fappin' to his 87' program from the game. Sad little man.

Living in the past? If the past is about 5-10 years ago then yes, Im living in the past. How old are you jit? All this sissified low expectation bs started with golden. if you are old enough to remember shannon got his *** ran outta town for way less than golden. now we make excuses and dream about winning coastal championships foh
 
I will never understand why Butch was considered the best hire. He is toothless and irrelevant for the past 15 years. Frank Beamer was his Daddy...1 season is all he had. 1 top ten finish, Richt 6...

Would his first 5 years as Miami coach and his first 4 years as North Carolina coach be acceptable to Cane fans now. I think not. 8-3, 9-3, 5-6, 9-3, 9-4 would get him fired. Richt was 52-13 in his first 5, Butch was 40-19. He is 15-17 in the ACC with great recruiting classes. He did well in a top heavy Big Least...

I don't think Richt is a great hire, but he is a better option than Butch...

I am so glad Blake did not kowtow to the clueless...
 
Richt is a good coach, and this is a good hire. Still think butch's savagery would have been what we needed. We'll be a perennial contender in the division and might be able to beat clemson or fsu for the title too, but I don't think richt has that dog in him, that we know butch does.
 
He was playing Duke, UVA, Wake Forest, Maryland, etc at UNC. And always 4 patsies out of conference. Larry Fedora is doing better at UNC. Sorry, but Butch doesn't come close to the success at UGA that he had here. Like I said, if you think it's easier to win NC at UGA than UM turn in your Canes card. The facts prove it's easier here. We have won five to UGAs two. Then again, math and analysis don't seem to be your strong suit so I doubt you'll get that concept.

Your clueless man. duke uva wake forest is in the same class as UNC. your acting like he was coaching at Miami, fsu, vatech, clemson or something.

u are seriously trying to compare UNC to Georgia? You are telling me that a coach would win more games at UNC than at Georgia? your not the brightest person.

just cuz we won 5 to UGA's 2 means that it is easier to win here? that stat is meaningless. Minnesota has 6 national championships, so does that mean its easier to win at Minnesota than at Georgia and Miami because they have more championships?

Horse****. UVA is .500 in their history and Duke and Wake WAY below .500, while UNC dominated the ACC for years and has a .562 all time wining %. Not even close to being in the same class. UNC is as strong relative to the ACC as UGA is to the SEC. In the 15 years prior to hiring Mark Richt UGA won 10 games only twice. TWICE. In 15 years. UNC won tens games 3 times over the same time frame. That's because of the level of competition. And by the way Davis average season at UNC was 7-6. Fedora has done a better job. 8-5. UNC improved after he left. And the real question isn't ****ing UNC relative to UGA but UM relative to UGA, but your stupid *** doesn't even realize that despite the fact that I've said it twice. You really are a moron. In the first half of the 20th century it would have been easier to win a NC at Minnesota. They were an elite program in the CFB world. That world has changed. You are comparing apples and oranges. UM is still a plum opportunity. Clearly a better place to win NC in the last thirty years than UGA. But don't burn out the 2 watt circuit in your head trying to figure that out.

LMAOO!!!! stopped reading right there. what are you smoking son? UNC dominated the ACC for years?? haha what planet have you been on. And then your touting a .562 winning percentage like thats supposed to be impressive??

are you serious or are you just trolling?

my man, calm down put down the joint and the liquor. wake up in the morning then reread and fix all that dumb sht u just wrote.

I'm not touting UNC as a huge powerhouse. But Butch's winnning % there is lower than that all time UNC winning % your cracking jokes about. He kind of failed there buddy. And that's your guy.

my man, those are your words not mine. and i quote "while UNC dominated the ACC for years" lmao

after reading that everything else you say is invalid.
 
Butch or Richt - either one were better than the last 3 - support the canes and support the coach
 
I will never understand why Butch was considered the best hire. He is toothless and irrelevant for the past 15 years. Frank Beamer was his Daddy...1 season is all he had. 1 top ten finish, Richt 6...

Would his first 5 years as Miami coach and his first 4 years as North Carolina coach be acceptable to Cane fans now. I think not. 8-3, 9-3, 5-6, 9-3, 9-4 would get him fired. Richt was 52-13 in his first 5, Butch was 40-19. He is 15-17 in the ACC with great recruiting classes. He did well in a top heavy Big Least...

I don't think Richt is a great hire, but he is a better option than Butch...

I am so glad Blake did not kowtow to the clueless...



Yea your right he has been irrelevant for 15 years except for when he took the NFL browns to the playoffs, brought UNC football up from the grave, and put a ****load of players in the NFL.
 
Advertisement
Your clueless man. duke uva wake forest is in the same class as UNC. your acting like he was coaching at Miami, fsu, vatech, clemson or something.

u are seriously trying to compare UNC to Georgia? You are telling me that a coach would win more games at UNC than at Georgia? your not the brightest person.

just cuz we won 5 to UGA's 2 means that it is easier to win here? that stat is meaningless. Minnesota has 6 national championships, so does that mean its easier to win at Minnesota than at Georgia and Miami because they have more championships?

Horse****. UVA is .500 in their history and Duke and Wake WAY below .500, while UNC dominated the ACC for years and has a .562 all time wining %. Not even close to being in the same class. UNC is as strong relative to the ACC as UGA is to the SEC. In the 15 years prior to hiring Mark Richt UGA won 10 games only twice. TWICE. In 15 years. UNC won tens games 3 times over the same time frame. That's because of the level of competition. And by the way Davis average season at UNC was 7-6. Fedora has done a better job. 8-5. UNC improved after he left. And the real question isn't ****ing UNC relative to UGA but UM relative to UGA, but your stupid *** doesn't even realize that despite the fact that I've said it twice. You really are a moron. In the first half of the 20th century it would have been easier to win a NC at Minnesota. They were an elite program in the CFB world. That world has changed. You are comparing apples and oranges. UM is still a plum opportunity. Clearly a better place to win NC in the last thirty years than UGA. But don't burn out the 2 watt circuit in your head trying to figure that out.

LMAOO!!!! stopped reading right there. what are you smoking son? UNC dominated the ACC for years?? haha what planet have you been on. And then your touting a .562 winning percentage like thats supposed to be impressive??

are you serious or are you just trolling?

my man, calm down put down the joint and the liquor. wake up in the morning then reread and fix all that dumb sht u just wrote.

I'm not touting UNC as a huge powerhouse. But Butch's winnning % there is lower than that all time UNC winning % your cracking jokes about. He kind of failed there buddy. And that's your guy.

my man, those are your words not mine. and i quote "while UNC dominated the ACC for years" lmao

after reading that everything else you say is invalid.


You said UNC was in the same class as Wake and Duke. Back it up statistically. You can't. You are making a straw argument. Meanwhile you ignore every fact that I've thrown out there. Nothing else I said was invalid. You are just too much of a moron to have an answer for it.
 
I will never understand why Butch was considered the best hire. He is toothless and irrelevant for the past 15 years. Frank Beamer was his Daddy...1 season is all he had. 1 top ten finish, Richt 6...

Would his first 5 years as Miami coach and his first 4 years as North Carolina coach be acceptable to Cane fans now. I think not. 8-3, 9-3, 5-6, 9-3, 9-4 would get him fired. Richt was 52-13 in his first 5, Butch was 40-19. He is 15-17 in the ACC with great recruiting classes. He did well in a top heavy Big Least...

I don't think Richt is a great hire, but he is a better option than Butch...

I am so glad Blake did not kowtow to the clueless...



Yea your right he has been irrelevant for 15 years except for when he took the NFL browns to the playoffs, brought UNC football up from the grave, and put a ****load of players in the NFL.

His average record at UNC was 7-6. How is that bringing the program up from the grave????
 
Horse****. UVA is .500 in their history and Duke and Wake WAY below .500, while UNC dominated the ACC for years and has a .562 all time wining %. Not even close to being in the same class. UNC is as strong relative to the ACC as UGA is to the SEC. In the 15 years prior to hiring Mark Richt UGA won 10 games only twice. TWICE. In 15 years. UNC won tens games 3 times over the same time frame. That's because of the level of competition. And by the way Davis average season at UNC was 7-6. Fedora has done a better job. 8-5. UNC improved after he left. And the real question isn't ****ing UNC relative to UGA but UM relative to UGA, but your stupid *** doesn't even realize that despite the fact that I've said it twice. You really are a moron. In the first half of the 20th century it would have been easier to win a NC at Minnesota. They were an elite program in the CFB world. That world has changed. You are comparing apples and oranges. UM is still a plum opportunity. Clearly a better place to win NC in the last thirty years than UGA. But don't burn out the 2 watt circuit in your head trying to figure that out.

LMAOO!!!! stopped reading right there. what are you smoking son? UNC dominated the ACC for years?? haha what planet have you been on. And then your touting a .562 winning percentage like thats supposed to be impressive??

are you serious or are you just trolling?

my man, calm down put down the joint and the liquor. wake up in the morning then reread and fix all that dumb sht u just wrote.

I'm not touting UNC as a huge powerhouse. But Butch's winnning % there is lower than that all time UNC winning % your cracking jokes about. He kind of failed there buddy. And that's your guy.

my man, those are your words not mine. and i quote "while UNC dominated the ACC for years" lmao

after reading that everything else you say is invalid.


You said UNC was in the same class as Wake and Duke. Back it up statistically. You can't. You are making a straw argument. Meanwhile you ignore every fact that I've thrown out there. Nothing else I said was invalid. You are just too much of a moron to have an answer for it.

Dont backtrack now. You said UNC dominated the ACC for years. How can I take you serious after a statement like that.

You have to be trolling. unc, wake, duke, uva, nc state, etc...all the same sht...stop trying to nitpick little stats to make UNC out to be some juggernaut.

bama, lsu, auburn, florida in the same class too. now i could nitpick stats and say no bama is better because this and that and the other, but you get the point. so stop trying to put UNC in the same class as fkin Georgia.

You have no feet to stand on after saying that UNC dominated the ACC for years. And then you are sitting here trying to compare UNC to Georgia. Like I said you have to be trolling
 
I will never understand why Butch was considered the best hire. He is toothless and irrelevant for the past 15 years. Frank Beamer was his Daddy...1 season is all he had. 1 top ten finish, Richt 6...

Would his first 5 years as Miami coach and his first 4 years as North Carolina coach be acceptable to Cane fans now. I think not. 8-3, 9-3, 5-6, 9-3, 9-4 would get him fired. Richt was 52-13 in his first 5, Butch was 40-19. He is 15-17 in the ACC with great recruiting classes. He did well in a top heavy Big Least...

I don't think Richt is a great hire, but he is a better option than Butch...

I am so glad Blake did not kowtow to the clueless...



Yea your right he has been irrelevant for 15 years except for when he took the NFL browns to the playoffs, brought UNC football up from the grave, and put a ****load of players in the NFL.

His average record at UNC was 7-6. How is that bringing the program up from the grave????

what we got here is a bunch of stat nerds. so you are going to ignore what Butch did at UNC? do you care to explain the circumstances during his time there? he obviously inherited a mess and had a bad first season where he won 4 games, which is how you come up with your little 7-6 average. after that he racked off 8 wins and was on pace for more but yanno, that little NCAA scandal happened and all those suspensions his last year. but yea lets just act like he was a complete failure there and lets also ignore all the NFl talent that came out of his time there.

people talk numbers with knowing what the **** they are talking about. take that 7-6 average and stick it up ur ***
 
Mark underperformance at GA is well known. Now that he is the coach at Miami. Once again this administration has felled its fan base. All the talking heads and reporters are building this as a great hire. And three to four years. We will be right back here again in mediocrity. We were suppose to get excellence not just good enough.

Fan based "felled"?
WTF are you talking about?
How about dragging your illiterate culo out to the game instead of being a typical whiny, petulant Keyboard Cane fan?
 
LMAOO!!!! stopped reading right there. what are you smoking son? UNC dominated the ACC for years?? haha what planet have you been on. And then your touting a .562 winning percentage like thats supposed to be impressive??

are you serious or are you just trolling?

my man, calm down put down the joint and the liquor. wake up in the morning then reread and fix all that dumb sht u just wrote.

I'm not touting UNC as a huge powerhouse. But Butch's winnning % there is lower than that all time UNC winning % your cracking jokes about. He kind of failed there buddy. And that's your guy.

my man, those are your words not mine. and i quote "while UNC dominated the ACC for years" lmao

after reading that everything else you say is invalid.


You said UNC was in the same class as Wake and Duke. Back it up statistically. You can't. You are making a straw argument. Meanwhile you ignore every fact that I've thrown out there. Nothing else I said was invalid. You are just too much of a moron to have an answer for it.

Dont backtrack now. You said UNC dominated the ACC for years. How can I take you serious after a statement like that.

You have to be trolling. unc, wake, duke, uva, nc state, etc...all the same sht...stop trying to nitpick little stats to make UNC out to be some juggernaut.

bama, lsu, auburn, florida in the same class too. now i could nitpick stats and say no bama is better because this and that and the other, but you get the point. so stop trying to put UNC in the same class as fkin Georgia.

You have no feet to stand on after saying that UNC dominated the ACC for years. And then you are sitting here trying to compare UNC to Georgia. Like I said you have to be trolling

You never answered my question little strawman. Because I made one statement that was hyperbole does not invalidate my argument. I'm not trying to put UNC in the same class as UGA. But it's not a whole lot harder to win games there. In fact if you take out Mark Richt's stellar record at UGA, UNC and UGA have the same winning %. And Butch still only won 7 game a season at UNC.
 
I will never understand why Butch was considered the best hire. He is toothless and irrelevant for the past 15 years. Frank Beamer was his Daddy...1 season is all he had. 1 top ten finish, Richt 6...

Would his first 5 years as Miami coach and his first 4 years as North Carolina coach be acceptable to Cane fans now. I think not. 8-3, 9-3, 5-6, 9-3, 9-4 would get him fired. Richt was 52-13 in his first 5, Butch was 40-19. He is 15-17 in the ACC with great recruiting classes. He did well in a top heavy Big Least...

I don't think Richt is a great hire, but he is a better option than Butch...

I am so glad Blake did not kowtow to the clueless...



Yea your right he has been irrelevant for 15 years except for when he took the NFL browns to the playoffs, brought UNC football up from the grave, and put a ****load of players in the NFL.

His average record at UNC was 7-6. How is that bringing the program up from the grave????

what we got here is a bunch of stat nerds. so you are going to ignore what Butch did at UNC? do you care to explain the circumstances during his time there? he obviously inherited a mess and had a bad first season where he won 4 games, which is how you come up with your little 7-6 average. after that he racked off 8 wins and was on pace for more but yanno, that little NCAA scandal happened and all those suspensions his last year. but yea lets just act like he was a complete failure there and lets also ignore all the NFl talent that came out of his time there.

people talk numbers with knowing what the **** they are talking about. take that 7-6 average and stick it up ur ***

You really are a complete moron who lacks critical thinking skills. Completely.
 
Advertisement
I'm not touting UNC as a huge powerhouse. But Butch's winnning % there is lower than that all time UNC winning % your cracking jokes about. He kind of failed there buddy. And that's your guy.

my man, those are your words not mine. and i quote "while UNC dominated the ACC for years" lmao

after reading that everything else you say is invalid.


You said UNC was in the same class as Wake and Duke. Back it up statistically. You can't. You are making a straw argument. Meanwhile you ignore every fact that I've thrown out there. Nothing else I said was invalid. You are just too much of a moron to have an answer for it.

Dont backtrack now. You said UNC dominated the ACC for years. How can I take you serious after a statement like that.

You have to be trolling. unc, wake, duke, uva, nc state, etc...all the same sht...stop trying to nitpick little stats to make UNC out to be some juggernaut.

bama, lsu, auburn, florida in the same class too. now i could nitpick stats and say no bama is better because this and that and the other, but you get the point. so stop trying to put UNC in the same class as fkin Georgia.

You have no feet to stand on after saying that UNC dominated the ACC for years. And then you are sitting here trying to compare UNC to Georgia. Like I said you have to be trolling

You never answered my question little strawman. Because I made one statement that was hyperbole does not invalidate my argument. I'm not trying to put UNC in the same class as UGA. But it's not a whole lot harder to win games there. In fact if you take out Mark Richt's stellar record at UGA, UNC and UGA have the same winning %. And Butch still only won 7 game a season at UNC.

strawman? you are one that said "UNC dominated the ACC for years", not me. Hyperbole??? UNC has never even been close to dominating the ACC wtf are you talking about. thats like me saying the Charlotte Bobcats have been dominating the Eastern Conference for years. your statement couldnt be farther from the truth.

now DEFLECTION is what you are doing. you made one of the dumbest statement a person can possibly make and now you are trying to talk about strawman and STILL you are trying to tell me that UGA isnt a way better job than UNC. you are either delusional or trolling.
 
my man, those are your words not mine. and i quote "while UNC dominated the ACC for years" lmao

after reading that everything else you say is invalid.


You said UNC was in the same class as Wake and Duke. Back it up statistically. You can't. You are making a straw argument. Meanwhile you ignore every fact that I've thrown out there. Nothing else I said was invalid. You are just too much of a moron to have an answer for it.

Dont backtrack now. You said UNC dominated the ACC for years. How can I take you serious after a statement like that.

You have to be trolling. unc, wake, duke, uva, nc state, etc...all the same sht...stop trying to nitpick little stats to make UNC out to be some juggernaut.

bama, lsu, auburn, florida in the same class too. now i could nitpick stats and say no bama is better because this and that and the other, but you get the point. so stop trying to put UNC in the same class as fkin Georgia.

You have no feet to stand on after saying that UNC dominated the ACC for years. And then you are sitting here trying to compare UNC to Georgia. Like I said you have to be trolling

You never answered my question little strawman. Because I made one statement that was hyperbole does not invalidate my argument. I'm not trying to put UNC in the same class as UGA. But it's not a whole lot harder to win games there. In fact if you take out Mark Richt's stellar record at UGA, UNC and UGA have the same winning %. And Butch still only won 7 game a season at UNC.

strawman? you are one that said "UNC dominated the ACC for years", not me. Hyperbole??? UNC has never even been close to dominating the ACC wtf are you talking about. thats like me saying the Charlotte Bobcats have been dominating the Eastern Conference for years. your statement couldnt be farther from the truth.

now DEFLECTION is what you are doing. you made one of the dumbest statement a person can possibly make and now you are trying to talk about strawman and STILL you are trying to tell me that UGA isnt a way better job than UNC. you are either delusional or trolling.

No deflection. I ate my mis-statement. Took responsibility. You've not addressed any of the FACTS I have brought up though. THAT is deflection. Little strawman.
 
Back
Top