MaRiO NeEds his OwN GuYs

lincoln just corched his way to an L with a much more talented roster, and a vastly superior "blue chip ratio". this is what happens when you lose a game and have the better "blue chip ratio", right? you get corch in front of your name

So USC and Miami both have corches?
 
Advertisement
lincoln just corched his way to an L with a much more talented roster, and a vastly superior "blue chip ratio". this is what happens when you lose a game and have the better "blue chip ratio", right? you get corch in front of your name
Utah was the betting favorite.

Riley did make a mistake not using his TOs and giving his offense more time.

That said he’s done great there, they are vastly improved.

If you are somehow comparing losing @Utah to what is going on at Miami right now, you need better material.
 
Something about the 6-1 corch that looks better than the 3-3 corch right now.

look I dont make the rules around here but if you lose a game with a better blue chip ratio than the other team even before you added the #1 QB recruit in the country from 2 cycles ago AND the Biletnikoff winner at WR AND the starting RB from Oregon who ran for 1200 yards last yr and 16 TDS then you are a corch. just the way it is sorry it triggers you
 
look I dont make the rules around here but if you lose a game with a better blue chip ratio than the other team even before you added the #1 QB recruit in the country from 2 cycles ago AND the Biletnikoff winner at WR AND the starting RB from Oregon who ran for 1200 yards last yr and 16 TDS then you are a corch. just the way it is sorry it triggers you

I know you’re trolling but carry on thinking USC isn’t having a better rebound right now…

…because their corch outportaled our corch…
 
Are we debating lincoln and mario😂😂 how, we would have max 1 loss under linncoln most likely we would he undefeated we have a top 10 draft pick qb who was getting votes for the heisman before the year started and we’ve played a cupcake schedule
 
Im not sure fans understand how hard it was for us to lose 3 games at this point that is a miracle we defy odd’s inverse
 
Advertisement
look I dont make the rules around here but if you lose a game with a better blue chip ratio than the other team even before you added the #1 QB recruit in the country from 2 cycles ago AND the Biletnikoff winner at WR AND the starting RB from Oregon who ran for 1200 yards last yr and 16 TDS then you are a corch. just the way it is sorry it triggers you
If Lincoln Riley, in his 1st year at USC, losing to Utah (under their 20th something year with Kyle Whittingham) by 3 points makes him a corch then this website just needs to retire that idiotic term because clearly people do not know how to use it in the correct context.
 
20CA9DDE-B18D-421B-A802-8301C7A76390.jpeg
 
Look at the first-year coaches on that list:

Oklahoma -- 4th in bluechip ratio, they have lost 3 games in a row and just lost forty-nine to zero to their biggest rival
LSU -- Multiple losses, one to FSU, one where they got blown out of their own stadium by Tennessee
Notre Dame -- Multiple losses, one at home to Marshall
uf -- Multiple losses, almost lost at home to USF, almost lost to Missouri
Oregon -- Lost by 500 to UGA (no real shame there), but looked pretty decent otherwise (Mario's kids?)


If we're losing to App State at home in Year 5 with the 5th highest blue-chip ratio like A&M, or being blown out of our building multiple times with the 15th highest ratio and a tenured coach like Auburn, it might be time to pull the oh **** cord.

But literally every single first-year coach on this list is struggling. Some mightily, like Venables. LSU looks absolutely awful, and as much as Kelly is a lowlife murderer, he took multiple ND teams to the playoffs and has the 7th most talent, according to this list. He may not be an elite coach, but he's not a completely terrible coach.

Again, I'm not necessarily comparing these teams to ours. And not excusing the losses, especially MTSU. But first-year coaches are struggling here, and on paper they also have a lot of talent.

The bottom line is, it's too early to tell anything long-term, good or bad. We're certainly not off to a great start here, and the last 3 weeks have given me an ulcer, but what has happened so far is NOT INDICITIVE of long-term performance. Period. It is very, very possible to build a good program in the next couple years, even with what has transpired so far. UGA had the #12 class in the country in 2014, the #8 class in 2015, and the #6 class in 2015. Kirby Smart's first year, 2016, they went 8-5. They lost to Vanderbilt, at home. They've gone to a NY6 bowl every year since. Let's give it a year or two before we go berserk.

Don’t bring that logical post to this board that’s not how it works. 6 games in the pitchforks are out and narratives already created that everyone and everything related to Miami sucks.
 
If Lincoln Riley, in his 1st year at USC, losing to Utah (under their 20th something year with Kyle Whittingham) by 3 points makes him a corch then this website just needs to retire that idiotic term because clearly people do not know how to use it in the correct context.

If you lose, you're a corch. That's how it works here.
 
lincoln just corched his way to an L with a much more talented roster, and a vastly superior "blue chip ratio". this is what happens when you lose a game and have the better "blue chip ratio", right? you get corch in front of your name

If Riley had lost to a bad G5 program at home, a mediocre out of conference opponent, and another less talented conference opponent AND THEN lost to Utah, then yes, he'd be a leading candidate for corch of the year and USC fans would be justified in saying they got sold a lemon.
 
Advertisement
The thing about Mario though, eventhough he’s a former OL, Miami averaged more passes per game than runs each of his 4 years.….3 of those 4 years they averaged 40+ passes per game. The low was 36. So he played for an offense 30+ years ago that threw the ball all over. What “old school” offense is he holding on to?
Maybe it’s that offense we used against FSU in 1990. Dennis surprised Bowden and went REALLY run heavy in that game (it was my first Miami/FSU game that I attended in person). FSU had no answer for it.

 
listen, we all know the coaching staff has had issues and could be doing much better than they are. but it's pretty **** telling that nearly all of our emerging difference makers sans TVD (colbie young, mesidor, d jackson, parrish) are dudes mario just brought in and nearly all of the worst players are basically the usual suspects who have been here and stayed bad. the talent evals and development the past several years have simply been horrible, and while mario hasn't exactly helped himself year one, i think it's pretty reasonable to give it a bit of time and see what he can come up with recruiting and development wise.
 
look I dont make the rules around here but if you lose a game with a better blue chip ratio than the other team even before you added the #1 QB recruit in the country from 2 cycles ago AND the Biletnikoff winner at WR AND the starting RB from Oregon who ran for 1200 yards last yr and 16 TDS then you are a corch. just the way it is sorry it triggers you
Yea we can be intentionally dense and flatten all distinctions and reduce concepts ad absurdum to pretend there has been no difference in coaching performance b/w any of these guys.

Saban had the better ratio and lost to Tennessee -> Saban corch. Mario corch. All corching is equivalent. Saban = Mario. QED.
 
Back
Top