- Joined
- Feb 8, 2013
- Messages
- 5,477
Selling. His shoulder injury didn't affect the offense being able to line up and run the football early in games.
So you're not buying that his shoulder was hurt becasue we couldn't run the ball? Are you retarded?
I was 10 rows up dead center for the UVA and Pitt games. He was not only horribly inaccurate but had no zip on the ball whatsoever. He was floating balls on speed cuts. I'm not a Malik apologist but he was clearly not the same QB after the UNC game.
Was his shoulder injured? Maybe.
Was it the reason we lost to Pitt and got hammered by Clemson? Probably not.
His shoulder was fine for 5-6 GT at home, FSU 6-6, and 4-8 Syracuse at home. Was his shoulder injury the reason the offense was garbage then?
My point was, regardless of injury, we couldn't line up and run the football effectively. That's the reason the offense sucked, not because a 55% completion QB's shoulder was injured.
Again I'm no Malik apologist but it was clear to anyone who watched the team and doesn't hate the kid just to hate him that he wasn't the same after UNC. If he can hit those deep shots that he hit early on in the season, opposing defenses can't load up and the running game is better. Pretty simple football 101.