The tech kicker had a higher gross punting yardage number (48 vs. 47.2). Both gross and net are situationally dependent but can’t argue with gross being the deciding criterion.So how wasn’t he 1st team AA w/ Jose, again?
I never said they were. However to be historically #1 at net punting means our punt coverage unit was ELITE.Our kicker and punter were elite. Our “special teams” was not.
So do our specials teams still suck?
Well..... considering he's Aussie and played Rugby......Remember when we signed him and I was ecstatic just based on the eye test. He just had that Aussie rugby look to him that I thought was going to be crazy good for us. Glad that initial feeling was right.
I was losing it just at the thought of making an attempt..... That sucked feeling that way...We had the best kicker & best punter in the nation in the same year. Pretty incredible. I never wanna go back to ripping my shirt off after an extra point miss again.
...I never wanna go back to ripping my shirt off after an extra point miss again.
I think you're confusing 1 phase of special teams with the unit as a whole. teams is plural and if only 1 unit isn't up to snuff, but the other are really good bordering on elite then wouldn't your whole unit be at least good?Considering the first priority on ST is to field the **** ball? Yes, they still suck.
I think you're confusing 1 phase of special teams with the unit as a whole. teams is plural and if only 1 unit isn't up to snuff, but the other are really good bordering on elite then wouldn't your whole unit be at least good?
So do our specials teams still suck?
Not an Aussie. Not tatted head to toe.Bosher