SWFLHurricane
Recruit
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2014
- Messages
- 29,965
Oh look...another guy who played for UM with sanity.....He’s a baller, some of you guys will find anything to complain about
Oh look...another guy who played for UM with sanity.....He’s a baller, some of you guys will find anything to complain about
It’s a dying breedOh look...another guy who played for UM with sanity.....
LolIt’s a dying breed
That’s obviously hyperbole, but the math isn’t on your side. The % of players going to the next level increase exponentially with each star. So yea, you’ll find the 2* players who make it to the NFL. But they’re outliers. The star system is actuay pretty accurate.
The star system indicates the likelihood a player is successful in college. It doesn’t have anything to do w likelihood a player is successful in the NFL.That's a very simplified way of looking at things. Obviously the math doesn't favor 3 star, 2 star, and unranked players, because of the sheer volume of those players compared to 5 & 4 star players. This simplified view fails to account numerous variables/factors which prevent the analysis from being placed into a proper context. Not the least of which is examining the correlation between recruiting rankings, and the players that actually end up being SUCCESSFUL in the NFL. It's not enough to simply look at the players who get drafted-that doesn't provide us anything meaningful.
That's a very simplified way of looking at things. Obviously the math doesn't favor 3 star, 2 star, and unranked players, because of the sheer volume of those players compared to 5 & 4 star players. This simplified view fails to account numerous variables/factors which prevent the analysis from being placed into a proper context. Not the least of which is examining the correlation between recruiting rankings, and the players that actually end up being SUCCESSFUL in the NFL. It's not enough to simply look at the players who get drafted-that doesn't provide us anything meaningful.