Kirby smart hype!!

Advertisement
Who looks at a newborn male baby, freshly extracted from a gaping haggard split face hair shark, and thinks "hmm...he looks like a Stetson"?
 
he rejuvenated the program a bit but Richt did more for georiga than kirby did

kirby inherited a machine and still can't make it happen, richt got them there from nothing
 
Kirby will likely go after Rattler or the kid from OSU. then they will absolutely be championship material
 
Hopefully in first round..
No way the committee does that
Why not, no one wants to see them in final.. It makes more sense to have them go head to head again.. **** it
Because they have purposely avoided this in the past.

My guess: Alabama, Michigan, Georgia, Cincinnati

Round 1: Alabama over Cincinnati and Georgia over Michigan
Championship: Georgia over Alabama
FML
 
If Michigan wins they should be #1.

Anthony Anderson Reaction GIF by Cameo
 
Advertisement
CHeck the post date bro, I quoted that right after the sec game, this **** is boring.. No reason for us to have the same game again.. Or maybe I miss what you are saying
I’m saying I saw it coming weeks ago too. I knew the committee would set it up so the SEC teams would only face each other again in the title game. So they can spend two weeks talking about SEC dominance.

Good on you for owning it though. I do think it’s boring but they are the two best teams. Not much to be said on that.
 
I’m saying I saw it coming weeks ago too. I knew the committee would set it up so the SEC teams would only face each other again in the title game. So they can spend two weeks talking about SEC dominance.

Good on you for owning it though. I do think it’s boring but they are the two best teams. Not much to be said on that.
I hope people don’t honestly think the committee rank the top 4 in order.
They rank them to theoretically maximise the games. No way they were ever going to put UGA at 4 and have a rematch in the semi.
Same thing will happen with an expansion. The way teams get ranked will change
 
Advertisement
I hope people don’t honestly think the committee rank the top 4 in order.
They rank them to theoretically maximise the games. No way they were ever going to put UGA at 4 and have a rematch in the semi.
Same thing will happen with an expansion. The way teams get ranked will change
There’s no way you could take what we saw from these four teams this szn and conclude with a straight face that UGA was the 4th seed. By absolutely no metric..and by no metric could you Not have Bama 1 after what they did to a UGA team that dominated everyone but Bama. The committee got it right. And 2 best teams from 2021 will rightfully play for it all
 
There’s no way you could take what we saw from these four teams this szn and conclude with a straight face that UGA was the 4th seed. By absolutely no metric..and by no metric could you Not have Bama 1 after what they did to a UGA team that dominated everyone but Bama. The committee got it right. And 2 best teams from 2021 will rightfully play for it all
I don’t disagree with you. No way Georgia was the 4th team, and the 2 best teams are playing for it.
However, Just imagine if there was no playoff, and it was just the 2 top teams…would the rankings be the same? Maybe, maybe not? If it was an 8 team playoff, would it be different to the current to 8. I could make an argument that they would
That’s all.
 
Back
Top