forums

Kill Trolls Dead Thread

Advertisement
OBLIVION said:
You can never say that i've never tried to work with you. I got the dm's and @Andrew and @DMoney. As witnesses as to all i wanted was for you to cut the **** and post about this team.

This isn't a witch hunt. i have no issues with you posting here as long as you follow the same rules that everyone else is suppose to follow.
Click to expand...
Just for clarity , when I made the post asking if it was a witch hunt it was made in jest playing off of the post I quoted . I personally can't stand the constant *** innuendo NYSOM inserts everywhere on the site.
 
OBLIVION said:
2 wrongs don't make a right. That is the entire problem with this place. No one can be the bigger man and just walk away.

I posted a thread earlier today and it has a few people after me because i didn't meet their grammer lvl. I could've gone at them but whats the point? I could've be a vengeful prick and gave them a warning but i didn't. Walk away sometimes.
Click to expand...
Excellent point about 2 wrongs don’t make a right and then the never ending back and forth that totally derails the initial discussion of a certain thread.
Additionally, some infractions are obviously more heinous than others. Faking a DM with content that is extremely derogatory is about as extreme as it gets.
 
Dr.L.ThugU said:
Just for clarity , when I made the post asking if it was a witch hunt it was made in jest playing off of the post I quoted . I personally can't stand the constant *** innuendo NYSOM inserts everywhere on the site.
Click to expand...
Even if he does weigh more than a duck.
 
nystateofmind said:
What?

“Redneck” is a racial slur?

After the dude had called me mentally ill about 10 times when he knew I couldn’t respond?
Click to expand...


"When he knew I couldn't respond".

You really shouldn't toss around terms like "triggered" when it is obvious that you are projecting.

Your ego is perilously fragile. You think everything is about you. You think you are persecuted. You think that you are always right and that everyone else is wrong. You feel compelled to "set the record straight" over minor misunderstandings over whether one or another of your multiple screen names has been banned.

I can't diagnose mental illness, but I can recommend that you have your mental health checked.

For the record, I have no idea whether you can or cannot respond, and until I was told by RVA the terms of your banishment, I had no idea how long you would be gone or if you were posting under another name. Yet you bizarrely continue to speak as if we put you into some sort of Hannibal Lecter restraints and hurled insults at your face.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
"When he knew I couldn't respond".

You really shouldn't toss around terms like "triggered" when it is obvious that you are projecting.

Your ego is perilously fragile. You think everything is about you. You think you are persecuted. You think that you are always right and that everyone else is wrong. You feel compelled to "set the record straight" over minor misunderstandings over whether one or another of your multiple screen names has been banned.

I can't diagnose mental illness, but I can recommend that you have your mental health checked.

For the record, I have no idea whether you can or cannot respond, and until I was told by RVA the terms of your banishment, I had no idea how long you would be gone or if you were posting under another name. Yet you bizarrely continue to speak as if we put you into some sort of Hannibal Lecter restraints and hurled insults at your face.
Click to expand...
This is true. TOC did not know NYSOM is ordinarily blocked from this thread
 
Advertisement
JD08 said:
People don't usually go full Snopes and plenty of people believed it. But...

Was posted immediately after his **** hobby slam.
Was not an exact duplicate of a real message.

That's 2 in your favor that I see.
Click to expand...
Seriously, in all fairness, 2 wrongs thing aside, he was essentially attacked with a homo slur and he fought back with that and it was immediate. In context, I don’t find it egregious like if he just did it out of left field.
 
nystateofmind said:
He knew I was banned from the site.
Click to expand...

I also saw people giving "the wink" that you were "around", and there was ongoing talk about you getting an early release.

Furthermore, my posts are here, they haven't been deleted, and you can search them.

What difference does it make if you "respond" a few days later? What, if I say something and you don't get to "set the record straight" a minute later, it becomes accepted fact? What about all the time that passed when you didn't acknowledge that your fake DM from Austin was just a horrible joke?

You either need a mental health checkup or a long honest look in the mirror. You are literally claiming that your motivation stems from "not being able to respond" when you were banned for OTHER reasons. For at least some time period, I had no idea you were even banned. There is no tote board that shows who is banned and for how long. Why do you assume that I know your business?

"He knew I was banned from the site"

"He knew I couldn't respond"

Seriously, you have a problem. You have a fragility of ego that is truly bizarre, abnormal, and unproductive.
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I also saw people giving "the wink" that you were "around", and there was ongoing talk about you getting an early release.

Furthermore, my posts are here, they haven't been deleted, and you can search them.

What difference does it make if you "respond" a few days later? What, if I say something and you don't get to "set the record straight" a minute later, it becomes accepted fact? What about all the time that passed when you didn't acknowledge that your fake DM from Austin was just a horrible joke?

You either need a mental health checkup or a long honest look in the mirror. You are literally claiming that your motivation stems from "not being able to respond" when you were banned for OTHER reasons. For at least some time period, I had no idea you were even banned. There is no tote board that shows who is banned and for how long. Why do you assume that I know your business?

"He knew I was banned from the site"

"He knew I couldn't respond"

Seriously, you have a problem. You have a fragility of ego that is truly bizarre, abnormal, and unproductive.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
RVACane said:
Seriously, in all fairness, 2 wrongs thing aside, he was essentially attacked with a homo slur and he fought back with that and it was immediate. In context, I don’t find it egregious like if he just did it out of left field.
Click to expand...


I fail to see the "homo slur".

First sentence was that NYSOM needs to get a hobby. NOTHING WRONG.

The second sentence said that TROLLING for d!ck was not a hobby.

Was there a third sentence which was edited out of this vicious "attack"? Am I missing something here? I do NOT want to be unfair to NYSOM, but how in the **** is this an "attack"?

Literally, NYSOM is the definition of a troll, and he has a fake-***-schtick. Is there something else that Austin said that justifies...NOT a rebuttal from NYSOM ("I am not actually ***, that is just my fake-***-persona)...but an actual counter-attack to a non-attack in which he fakes a DM so convincingly that nobody realizes it is a fake DM?

Again, I'll be open-minded and fair to NYSOM if you give me something to go on, I just fail to see the "attack".

This is like someone throwing a tissue at someone, followed by the other person pulling out a gun.

Does anyone else see the disproportionality? Where is the original "attack" that warranted a fake outing?
 
Advertisement
TheOriginalCane said:
I fail to see the "homo slur".

First sentence was that NYSOM needs to get a hobby. NOTHING WRONG.

The second sentence said that TROLLING for d!ck was not a hobby.

Was there a third sentence which was edited out of this vicious "attack"? Am I missing something here? I do NOT want to be unfair to NYSOM, but how in the **** is this an "attack"?

Literally, NYSOM is the definition of a troll, and he has a fake-***-schtick. Is there something else that Austin said that justifies...NOT a rebuttal from NYSOM ("I am not actually ***, that is just my fake-***-persona)...but an actual counter-attack to a non-attack in which he fakes a DM so convincingly that nobody realizes it is a fake DM?

Again, I'll be open-minded and fair to NYSOM if you give me something to go on, I just fail to see the "attack".

This is like someone throwing a tissue at someone, followed by the other person pulling out a gun.

Does anyone else see the disproportionality? Where is the original "attack" that warranted a fake outing?
Click to expand...
He said he was trolling for dîck. So he got it back.
 
OBLIVION said:
@nystateofmind you need to make a thread on the main board. Stating what you posted about @AustinCane6688 was a fake.

I don't want to see any of your sly *** **** either. I want an apology that i best believe.
Click to expand...


"I am sorry that the tech-illiterate posters on CIS did not comprehend my obviously fake DM, and I do not possess evidence that Austin is not ***."
 
TheOriginalCane said:
I fail to see the "homo slur".

First sentence was that NYSOM needs to get a hobby. NOTHING WRONG.

The second sentence said that TROLLING for d!ck was not a hobby.

Was there a third sentence which was edited out of this vicious "attack"? Am I missing something here? I do NOT want to be unfair to NYSOM, but how in the **** is this an "attack"?

Literally, NYSOM is the definition of a troll, and he has a fake-***-schtick. Is there something else that Austin said that justifies...NOT a rebuttal from NYSOM ("I am not actually ***, that is just my fake-***-persona)...but an actual counter-attack to a non-attack in which he fakes a DM so convincingly that nobody realizes it is a fake DM?

Again, I'll be open-minded and fair to NYSOM if you give me something to go on, I just fail to see the "attack".

This is like someone throwing a tissue at someone, followed by the other person pulling out a gun.

Does anyone else see the disproportionality? Where is the original "attack" that warranted a fake outing?
Click to expand...
He is the biggest shtick troll out there. That’s why I keep his shtick out of this thread.
 
RVACane said:
He said he was trolling for dîck. So he got it back.
Click to expand...


First, I believe that NYSOM is, quite literally, trolling for d!ck.

Second, I just went back and re-read the sentence (two clauses, one sentence) and it reads:

"Home boy needs to find a hobby, and trolling for d!ck isn't one of them"

Setting aside the obvious grammar error ("them" is plural and refers back to "hobby", which is singular), I read that sentence to say that "trolling for d!ck" is NOT a hobby for "home boy" (hereafter "NYSOM") to find.

So where is any accusation of what NYSOM is (or isn't)?

NYSOM needs to find a hobby.

"Trolling for d!ck" is not a hobby that NYSOM needs to find.

Is that an "attack"? Is that a "homo slur"? Have I suddenly, and late-in-life, lost all ability to comprehend the English language?

If I had NYSOM's personality, I would start to believe that this whole thing is a troll on me.
 
Back
Top