Again, running up against my ignorance regarding how the college athletics search game works. Does the search firm purely "vet" candidates they're given or do they go out and find candidates and present them to Uni for consideration? The former seems very low value add and as such I doubt they'd get paid a big contingency fee.
And what, precisely, does "vet" mean? Most recruiting firms I've worked with, that just describes them reviewing your resume, maybe a transcript if it's a younger candidate, and going through some interviews to make sure you'll be a baseline competitive in the actual interviews. At this level I'm sure it's more intensive, and maybe does involve some kind of official or BG check situation.
It seems to me that the more important question to ask is, assuming this is leaked from an actual inside source, why was this leaked at all? Is the news true, and it's being leaked by a pro-Jurich group to put pressure on the search firm? Is it true, and it's being leaked by the anti-Jurich contingent, to cast doubt on both the process and the candidate? Is it not really true, but is being leaked by one of those constituencies for those or perhaps other reasons? None of the above?