- Joined
- Apr 10, 2017
- Messages
- 3,073
What would this team have to do on the field this season with our schedule, to be considered the best all around Miami Hurricanes team ever fielded? Stats pls.
they won't. the 2001 team would go 8-4 without scoring an offensive touchdown.What would this team have to do on the field this season with our schedule, to be considered the best all around Miami Hurricanes team ever fielded? Stats pls.
What would this team have to do on the field this season with our schedule, to be considered the best all around Miami Hurricanes team ever fielded? Stats pls.
Can’t your argue that football talent in general is greater now a days and spread out over more teams? Meanwhile there’s the same number of first round slots.The only stat that would put it in the running with the '01 team is if this team had more first rounders.
Win the whole thing and I'll argue it's the greatest team in CFB history with no regrets.
Win the title and be up there with draft picks in number and quality. And then those draft picks go on to be great NFL playersWhat would this team have to do on the field this season with our schedule, to be considered the best all around Miami Hurricanes team ever fielded? Stats pls.
I'm not sure it's possible to play a full schedule without at least one lucky breakn nail bite game. Who was the last team to just steam roll every team on their schedule in the modern era?16-0 and no close games relying on divine intervention to beat BC or FSU.
Do you know the margin of victory and SOS for the 2001 team? I bet not. I don't. But you and I know that CP, Andre Johnson, Dorsey, Gore, McKinnie, KWII, Shockey, Roscoe, Rolle, DJ Williams, Ed Reed, Sean Tay, Buch, Vilma, and Wilfork were on the team. (Good lord, that's a lot to type!). I am bullish on this year's team but not sure there's equivalent NFL talent on this team as there was in 2001. So I still think teams are assessed by the talent not specific stats.Can’t your argue that football talent in general is greater now a days and spread out over more teams? Meanwhile there’s the same number of first round slots.
I think it would have to be close to be in the conversation but I would use this as the primary stat. # of wins followed by margin of victory and SOS imo.
I know the nail biters where they didn't look their best. I think that's something to watch for. No team can be 100% consistent through the season against everyone, especially now with more parity and more games, but can probably still compare the average.Do you know the margin of victory and SOS for the 2001 team? I bet not. I don't. But you and I know that CP, Andre Johnson, Dorsey, Gore, McKinnie, KWII, Shockey, Roscoe, Rolle, DJ Williams, Ed Reed, Sean Tay, Buch, Vilma, and Wilfork were on the team. (Good lord, that's a lot to type!). I am bullish on this year's team but not sure there's equivalent NFL talent on this team as there was in 2001. So I still think teams are assessed by the talent not specific stats.
We may win an NC who knows, but I can almost guarantee the above is not going to happen. Even if we go undefeated, which is rare and hard to do, zero chance we dominate every game and especially every playoff game. But it’s OK to have a positive attitude and be optimistic about the future as long as people don’t turn into whiny ******* at the first sign of trouble.16-0 and dominate in every playoff game plus the ACCCG.
I didn't say it would. The question was what would it take to put 2026 int he same conversations as 2001.We may win an NC who knows, but I can almost guarantee the above is not going to happen. Even if we go undefeated, which is rare and hard to do, zero chance we dominate every game and especially every playoff game. But it’s OK to have a positive attitude and be optimistic about the future as long as people don’t turn into whiny ******* at the first sign of trouble.