If Sam Darnold Had Malik Rosiers Numbers...

252cane

All-ACC
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Messages
10,910
Darnold numbers are better than rosier. He has more ints than rosier but everything else is better.
 

The Franchise

All-American
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
37,687
Darnold numbers are better than rosier. He has more ints than rosier but everything else is better.
He's turned the ball over a million times. I think he fumbled a couple times in the Utah game. He's been a turnover machine all year. Those are the "numbers" that kill teams.
 

jhtheking

Junior
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
2,271
Darnold numbers are better than rosier. He has more ints than rosier but everything else is better.
Rosier's passer rating and QBR are better than Darnold's. Darnold has played 2 more games but has only thrown 3 more TDs and 6 more picks. You can't just shrug that off because Darnold has completed 3.6% more of his passes.
 
Last edited:

Zbrod95

All-ACC
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
13,266
Darnold numbers are better than rosier. He has more ints than rosier but everything else is better.
He's turned the ball over a million times. I think he fumbled a couple times in the Utah game. He's been a turnover machine all year. Those are the "numbers" that kill teams.
Alot of those turnovers(except the fumbles) is that he’s trying to do too much or he’s overthinking things. You see it when he throws, he hesitates and second guesses himself or he throws a good ball but the guy is blanketed and he can’t make a play. At some point, that coaching staff needs to calm him down and stop going for the big play as much as they do(they take a lot of shots) or take some of the load of his shoulders(they ask a lot of him...even for a guy as talented as he is)
 

112_cane

Freshman
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
500
Darnold numbers are better than rosier. He has more ints than rosier but everything else is better.
He's turned the ball over a million times. I think he fumbled a couple times in the Utah game. He's been a turnover machine all year. Those are the "numbers" that kill teams.
Darnold: (7 games)
15 TD's and 9 Int's (294 yards per game)
QB rating 141
37 rushes for 12 yards (8 fumbles)

Rosier: (5 games)
12 TD's and 3 Int's (274 yards per game)
QB rating 146
48 rushes for 128 yards (no fumbles)

I'll take Rosier's numbers and record
 

Sabetta

Junior
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
2,173
Keep winning and he might get into the mix. We go undefeated and beat ND on National TV he's definitely in.
Tv
 

canecat

Junior
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
2,695
That kid is not very good. Turnover machine . I have no use for a QB who passes for 4 TD but throws 3 INT.
 

407cane

All-ACC
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
6,602
Darnold numbers are better than rosier. He has more ints than rosier but everything else is better.
Rosier's passer rating and QBR are better than Darnold's. Darnold's has played 2 more games but has only thrown 3 more TDs and 6 more picks. You can't just shrug that off because Darnold has completed 3.6% more of his passes.
Exactly , anyone saying darnold has played better is a fool

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

brcane1

Sophomore
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,221
Rosier's numbers are really good factoring in how talented he is, and I'm not sure Richt is getting the credit he deserves for manufacturing that. It's nice to be the ones with the talent/system to make a QBs whose ceiling is a solid college level talent, put up efficient numbers.
 
Top