I agree but that doesn't mean Walton isn't really good. What I want to know is why did Richt not sit Walton and let him get healthy when Homer can clearly carry the load?
Please stop...I like Homer (his hands surprised me) and he is going to be a player. But Walton is that dude. Would have done the same thing with those same looks.
This.
It happens every time someone new plays.
Somebody claimed that Dallas Crawford was better than Duke Johnson.
Somebody (a lot of somebodies actually) claimed that Joe Yearby was better than Mark Walton.
And now this.
I happen to think that this claim isn't as far-fetched as the others though.
Homer at 100% is easily much better than Walton at 100%.
Walton will be the backup RB at best next year.
Homer is clearly a far more explosive athlete and has some nice moves as well.
Homer at 100% is easily much better than Walton at 100%.
Walton will be the backup RB at best next year.
Homer is clearly a far more explosive athlete and has some nice moves as well.
You guys are crazy. Walton was 1000 yd back last year and on his way again before he got injured. GTFOH Walton would start for 99% of any team in the nation, If not 100%... For those doubters name me better backs in college? Only a few will come to mind and even those are debatable.
Lol classic idiot overreaction. We ran a ton of quick throws today so we never got to see him deal with pass protection. His running skills were never in doubt.
Homer is clearly a far more explosive athlete and has some nice moves as well.
This is so not true.
It's funny how quickly people bail on players when they get hurt.
Walton was going for 200 yards on 10 carries a few weeks ago.
Now he's clearly not as good as Homer.
Maybe some of you Florida guys can clue me in to how good Lingard is from all that I read and see is a **** stud