imyrhuckleberry
Junior
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2018
- Messages
- 1,783
have been applied for with the NCAA and how many have been granted for 2019? Anyone know? I've looked but can't find the info . . . I'm pretty sure it can't be confidential.
All of them.
Except Tate’s.
But seriously everyday that goes by the NCAA can go ***** themselves. There’s zero reason miami should still be waiting for an answer
Same thing they did with the Shapiro investigation. Drag it out as long as possible so that the wait itself becomes a penalty to Miami.All of them.
Except Tate’s.
But seriously everyday that goes by the NCAA can go ***** themselves. There’s zero reason miami should still be waiting for an answer
So Fields' lawyer said the racist remarks weren't included in the application. What was in the application then? No coaching change, no new QB brought in... How is it that Martell's waiver would create bad precedent but Fields waiver doesn't?Just saw this on line:
Homepage Local 2023
Subscribe Here “,”nextArrow”:”“,”autoplay”:false,”autoplaySpeed”:5000,”rtl”:false}’ dir=”ltr”> Has Auburn Improved at Wide Receiver? Has Auburn improved at wide receiver? For most of the… Gamecocks Running Back Targets South Carolina fans have been clamoring for two years for… Could Amare...lastwordoncollegefootball.com
That’s exactly the scenario I’m fearing. It’s the only thing that makes sense. They are denying it and Tate’s attorney is fighting like a madman.The only GOOD explanation for it taking this long is that they were going to deny it and Tate’s lawyer is battling to the death.
However, the real explanation is that it’s Miami and the NCAA says f’em
Field's attorney didn't need to mention the racist remarks. They were understood. The story was widely circulated and anyone not living under a rock was likely familiar. The NCAA and University of Georgia wanted the situation to go away as quickly as possible.So Fields' lawyer said the racist remarks weren't included in the application. What was in the application then? No coaching change, no new QB brought in... How is it that Martell's waiver would create bad precedent but Fields waiver doesn't?
Field's attorney didn't need to mention the racist remarks. They were understood. The story was widely circulated and anyone not living under a rock was likely familiar. The NCAA and University of Georgia wanted the situation to go away as quickly as possible.
Martell will get cleared as well. Just be patient.
Field's attorney didn't need to mention the racist remarks. They were understood. The story was widely circulated and anyone not living under a rock was likely familiar. The NCAA and University of Georgia wanted the situation to go away as quickly as possible.
Martell will get cleared as well. Just be patient.
Why so confident?
So Fields' lawyer said the racist remarks weren't included in the application. What was in the application then? No coaching change, no new QB brought in... How is it that Martell's waiver would create bad precedent but Fields waiver doesn't?