forums

Here's what I know on Mark Matthews...

Advertisement
JADood said:
For the record, I said if the staff doesn’t land a top 10 class, the rep would take a hit. Not just MM. Missing on him would just be a lowlight to also not landing a top 10 class. But from what I’m reading, recruiting ranking don’t matter anymore all the sudden? Must have missed that memo.
Click to expand...
I do understand for sure it is a hit but as long as we got no cut Nick we good. To me he was a bigger recruit then Russel by 100 miles, MM is elite asf but we can’t force dude. Depending on who we pivot to we shall see if it hurts us, and we got till NSD. If we flip DJ and or Bryant I would not lose sleep over MM. If we also got Brysen Wright I won’t even care bruh, let MM go wear those military uniforms. Asher as well, bring me those monsters and I trust Mario can patch the OL eventually.
 
JADood said:
For the record, I said if the staff doesn’t land a top 10 class, the rep would take a hit. Not just MM. Missing on him would just be a lowlight to also not landing a top 10 class. But from what I’m reading, recruiting ranking don’t matter anymore all the sudden? Must have missed that memo.
Click to expand...
The only way we aren't signing a top 10 class would purely be because a couple of the 10 teams ahead of us have substantially more volume than us.
We are currently 9th on the composite with 11 commits (8th by average). Every team ranked ahead of us has between 2-10 more commits than us right now.

Teams I'd be surprised for us to finish higher than: A&M, Ohio St, Texas
Tossup but lean better than us: Oregon, ND
Tossup but lean worse than us: USC, LSU, UGA, TTU, UF*, OU*
Schools we will have a better class than: Michigan, UCLA*, PSU
* = Schools I think will chace volume and for that reason alone could technically finish with more "points" than us.
 
Last edited:
Bigzook said:
Just remember Samson is still here and was a 5star tackle coming out of HS … OL is the last position i worry about with our coaching staff … LB’s and DT’s are the only spots i really want us to get better at recruiting
Click to expand...
Welcome to CIS.

Those are two areas of need. It’s random but I’d also like us to get better at recruiting centers out of high school. I don’t know how we don’t land a top one every other year or so.
 
BigDikDaddyFromCincinnati said:
I have no proof. I am not a cyber sleuth. I have no evidence. However, no one has ever done what Cig did. Not even close.
That dude is dirty..... I'm conviced it'll come out eventually.
Click to expand...

From Google Gemini
——
While there isn't a specific public report confirming that **Indiana University (IU)** has deployed its massive supercomputing clusters (like **Big Red 200**) specifically to predict an opponent's next play in real-time, the technology to do so absolutely exists, and IU is uniquely positioned to use it.
The intersection of **Big Ten football** and **High-Performance Computing (HPC)** is becoming a major arms race. Here is how that process actually works and the rules that govern it:
### 1. The Technology: From Film to "Predictive Heatmaps"
In the past, graduate assistants spent 100+ hours a week manually "tagging" film (e.g., *“Down 3, distance 5, Shotgun formation, pass play”*). Modern AI models, often powered by computer vision, can now do this instantly:
* **Automated Tendency Tracking:** AI models analyze thousands of plays to find "tells." For example, it might identify that an opposing Offensive Coordinator calls a screen pass **82% of the time** if the left tackle has a slightly wider stance on 2nd and long.
* **Supercomputing Power:** While a laptop can run basic stats, a supercomputer can run **Monte Carlo simulations**—simulating a game 10,000 times based on an opponent's historical data to determine the most "mathematically likely" play call for every possible situation.
* **IU’s Advantage:** Indiana University is home to some of the most powerful academic supercomputers in the world. Their **Pervasive Technology Institute** specifically focuses on using these machines for "data-intensive applications," which includes the type of massive video datasets used in sports analytics.
### 2. The NCAA "Firewall" (The Rules)
The NCAA recently modernized its rules regarding technology, but they still maintain a strict line between **preparation** and **live execution**:
* **Pre-Game (Allowed):** Teams can use any AI or supercomputing model they want during the week to build their game plan. This is where they "load the film" and generate the "cheat sheets" coaches carry on the sidelines.
* **In-Game (Restricted):** As of the 2024-2025 seasons, the NCAA allows **tablets** on the sidelines and in the booth. However, these tablets are restricted to **video only**.
* **The "No-AI" Rule on Field:** NCAA rules (specifically *Rule 1-4-11*) strictly prohibit the use of "analytics, data or data access capability" on those sideline tablets. You can watch the play that just happened, but you cannot have an AI model on the tablet telling you, *"There is a 90% chance they run a draw play right now."*
### 3. The "Press Box" Loophole
While the sideline tablets are restricted, teams employ "Analysts" in the press box. These staffers can use sophisticated software to track tendencies during the game.
* They feed "live" data into their systems (e.g., *What personnel just walked onto the field?*).
* The software provides a suggestion.
* The analyst then relays that "insight" to the coordinator via the headset.
### Summary
Could Indiana use it? **Yes.** IU has the hardware (Big Red 200) and the burgeoning Sports Analytics program to build these models. Are they doing it? Like most high-level programs, they likely use AI-driven platforms (such as *Catapult* or *ANSRS*) that utilize machine learning to automate film study, even if they aren't yet plugging the football team directly into the university's main scientific supercomputing hub for every Saturday game.
 
RVACane said:
It’s random but I’d also like us to get better at recruiting centers out of high school. I don’t know how we don’t land a top one every other year or so.
Click to expand...
Thats about the position itself imo. Center is almost always a projection, because most HSs put their best Olineman at OT or at worst OG. There are maybe like 2-3 projected actual centers even in the top 250 recruits.. So the "top" part is kinda meh. And most center recruits are probably closer to the 400-650 range of ranking.

The projected centers we're even after/were after this year I think are Reed Ramsier, Gus Corsair, and Reis Russell. Ramsier plays OT in hs and is ranked 361 nationally / 89.76, Corsair plays OG and is ranked 300 / 90.71, Russell plays OT and is ranked 1000 / 86.50

Last yr centers Idk who the TOP guys would be. We got Woodrow ranked t963 / 87.33, and Sparks t963 / 87.33 lol.

25 we got SJ obviously who ranked 124 / 94.37. But he played Guard in HS at Gorman. Their actual center was Alai Kalaniuvalu who signed with BYU and was ranked 109 / 94.71...

24 idk if our center recruit was Plazz? He played OT in HS, and clearly had build of interior player. He was ranked 738 / 87.61

23 was the Connor Lew year. was what we all thought as the clear top center that year... and he was ranked 499 / 89.03 in the composite! And just looking at all the iOL prospects from 247 the other names I recognize as clear centers are Iapani Laloulu who signed with Oregon and is their starting center. he ranked 344 / 89.89. Dont particularly recognize any other centers...

22 just looking at names and if I recognize any centers, and only Parker Brailsford stands out who Signed with UW and was ranked 522 / 88.26. He transfered to bama and was their starting center and was picked in 5th round this year. ..... actually the interesting thing I notice is in this iOL class it had Armand Membou ranked 502 / 88.37 who was drafted 7th overall, Vega Ioane who was Ravens pick at 14 and ranked 574 / 87.96, Jonah Savaiinaea was was picked 38th by dolphins but was ranked 601 / 87.81, AND jalen Farmer who was drafted in the 4th this year and was ranked 690 / 87.37... That's a pretty monster hit rate for the 21st-31st ranked iOL... LITERALLY only 2 guys ranked ahead of Membou were drafted from what I can see - Emery Jones and Billy Schrauth (3rd and 5th respectively). .... Kinda crazy.

21 was actually a very good center class - Jager Burton was kentuckys starting center and drafted in 5th round. He ranked 139 / 93.87, but he played ot in hs. James Brockermeyer was in this class and he ranked 194 / 92.24, and he was actually a center in HS! This class also had Jackson Powers-Johnson who mario/mirabal signed to Oregon. He ranked 197 / 92.16 and he also actually played center in HS too i think and ended up a 2nd round pick. We got Ryan Rodriguez ranked 406 / 88.93. Jared Wilson signed with UGA and ended up a 3rd rounder. He ranked 450 / 88.56. Pat Coogan was drafted in 6th round and was Indianas starting Center after transfering from ND and ranked 613 / 87.37, But he played OT in HS. And then finally there is Jake Slaughter who was drafted at the end of the 2nd round by the Chargers. He was UFs starting center and ranked 697 / 86.93

2020 - 247 actually had Center rankings specifically. And the top 2 rated centers were rated very highly and played center and were drafted - Van pran 60/ 97.12 and Wypler 108 / 95.23. And then Seth McGlauglin who also went to Ohio st along with Wypler btw ranked 524 / 88.03... The guard rankings were a flop. But there was some good tackles...
 
AtlAtty said:
I will warn some of you right now that if you make this place insufferable with negativity I will not hesitate to put you in purgatory or worse.
This is still a Miami Hurricanes message boards for people who ENJOY discussions about the Hurricanes. That does not mean we cannot and should not be critical when deserved. But it does mean that gloating in negativity, or about your own predictions of failure, have no place on this board.

Let’s also keep in mind that this is recruiting and NONE of us knows exactly why a recruitment does in a certain direction. That is very different from watching a game and commenting about plays that can be objectively observed.

Govern yourselves accordingly and try to act like adults even if doing so goes against your nature.
Click to expand...
Thank God! Ur doin the Lord’s work brother
 
Dwinstitles said:
I do understand for sure it is a hit but as long as we got no cut Nick we good. To me he was a bigger recruit then Russel by 100 miles, MM is elite asf but we can’t force dude. Depending on who we pivot to we shall see if it hurts us, and we got till NSD. If we flip DJ and or Bryant I would not lose sleep over MM. If we also got Brysen Wright I won’t even care bruh, let MM go wear those military uniforms. Asher as well, bring me those monsters and I trust Mario can patch the OL eventually.
Click to expand...
Bring u those Monsters huh? BIG PAUSE!
GIF by Giphy QA
 
Advertisement
DMoney said:
It's not a money issue. We were ready to pay Matthews top of the market.

It wasn't effort. We recruited him forever as the top priority.

I don't think Cristobal and Mirabal forgot how to recruit offensive tackles, especially after watching Cantwell toss people all spring.

I also don't think it's about playing time. We play freshmen, and even if Matthews played RT (which he does in high school) he could still go Top 10 like Mauigoa and Fano.

So all that leads me to this conclusion: I think the kid just wants to go to Texas A&M. I don't understand it, but I'm not him. These guys are all different. Texas A&M did a better job recruiting him and looks like they'll win this battle. It's a brutal loss for the Canes.

All we can do is take the L and move forward. Consider it the recruiting version of the SMU game. Focus on Olu Olubobola and get it done. Elite offensive tackles are rare, and there is a big drop off to the next group (as we see in the first round of the NFL Draft). This needs to be a position where we continue to spend money on high school talent. Maybe we can flip Matthews back, but that's becoming less common in this era.

I still think we land a Top 5 class. But I also thought we'd get Matthews. So let's see what happens. We've got seven months. Go Canes.
Click to expand...
Why not go & Take the more receptive OT from Out of State instead of Matthew
That seems to want to Slap the Face of Miami ,Knowing Miami is widely Considered the best place to prepare you for the Pros?

If it was a safety, Corner , WR but an Offensive Tackle ? D Matthew were you not impressed by Three drafted how developed?

Markel Bell & Cooper are both testaments of the staff ability to Prepare.

Something is up with Matthew
Go Away if you don’t want this U.
 
JADood said:
For the record, I said if the staff doesn’t land a top 10 class, the rep would take a hit. Not just MM. Missing on him would just be a lowlight to also not landing a top 10 class. But from what I’m reading, recruiting ranking don’t matter anymore all the sudden? Must have missed that memo.
Click to expand...
We’d all love a top ranked class. But the “rep” has zero effect on us landing players, winning games, or anything else of importance. So does it really matter if his rep takes a hit?
 
Dwinstitles said:
Big O Cane said:
@AUcane

Maybe.. but he’d need to put on about 30lbs in spring and summer. Not impossible but i don’t think he gains weight that easy.

However, year 3 he’ll be a monster.

My guess why he’s not coming is because he sees an easier path to play at AM. All the other stuff is noise.
Click to expand...
You know they have high rated OL recruits at TAMU right?
Click to expand...
No doubt. They have studs. Read between the lines when I say “easier” path though.
 
My eyes bleed every time i see someone say he wants to play LT. He doesn’t play it in high school and doesn’t a&m have other top tackles committed? Its not even guaranteed he plays LT there
 
Advertisement
Handsome Squidbum said:
BigDikDaddyFromCincinnati said:
I have no proof. I am not a cyber sleuth. I have no evidence. However, no one has ever done what Cig did. Not even close.
That dude is dirty..... I'm conviced it'll come out eventually.
Click to expand...

From Google Gemini
——
While there isn't a specific public report confirming that **Indiana University (IU)** has deployed its massive supercomputing clusters (like **Big Red 200**) specifically to predict an opponent's next play in real-time, the technology to do so absolutely exists, and IU is uniquely positioned to use it.
The intersection of **Big Ten football** and **High-Performance Computing (HPC)** is becoming a major arms race. Here is how that process actually works and the rules that govern it:
### 1. The Technology: From Film to "Predictive Heatmaps"
In the past, graduate assistants spent 100+ hours a week manually "tagging" film (e.g., *“Down 3, distance 5, Shotgun formation, pass play”*). Modern AI models, often powered by computer vision, can now do this instantly:
* **Automated Tendency Tracking:** AI models analyze thousands of plays to find "tells." For example, it might identify that an opposing Offensive Coordinator calls a screen pass **82% of the time** if the left tackle has a slightly wider stance on 2nd and long.
* **Supercomputing Power:** While a laptop can run basic stats, a supercomputer can run **Monte Carlo simulations**—simulating a game 10,000 times based on an opponent's historical data to determine the most "mathematically likely" play call for every possible situation.
* **IU’s Advantage:** Indiana University is home to some of the most powerful academic supercomputers in the world. Their **Pervasive Technology Institute** specifically focuses on using these machines for "data-intensive applications," which includes the type of massive video datasets used in sports analytics.
### 2. The NCAA "Firewall" (The Rules)
The NCAA recently modernized its rules regarding technology, but they still maintain a strict line between **preparation** and **live execution**:
* **Pre-Game (Allowed):** Teams can use any AI or supercomputing model they want during the week to build their game plan. This is where they "load the film" and generate the "cheat sheets" coaches carry on the sidelines.
* **In-Game (Restricted):** As of the 2024-2025 seasons, the NCAA allows **tablets** on the sidelines and in the booth. However, these tablets are restricted to **video only**.
* **The "No-AI" Rule on Field:** NCAA rules (specifically *Rule 1-4-11*) strictly prohibit the use of "analytics, data or data access capability" on those sideline tablets. You can watch the play that just happened, but you cannot have an AI model on the tablet telling you, *"There is a 90% chance they run a draw play right now."*
### 3. The "Press Box" Loophole
While the sideline tablets are restricted, teams employ "Analysts" in the press box. These staffers can use sophisticated software to track tendencies during the game.
* They feed "live" data into their systems (e.g., *What personnel just walked onto the field?*).
* The software provides a suggestion.
* The analyst then relays that "insight" to the coordinator via the headset.
### Summary
Could Indiana use it? **Yes.** IU has the hardware (Big Red 200) and the burgeoning Sports Analytics program to build these models. Are they doing it? Like most high-level programs, they likely use AI-driven platforms (such as *Catapult* or *ANSRS*) that utilize machine learning to automate film study, even if they aren't yet plugging the football team directly into the university's main scientific supercomputing hub for every Saturday game.
Click to expand...
Wow. Can you apply that technology to the stock market?

Appreciate the template you laid out. They have to be up to SOMETHING. In three years he took one of the most historic losing programs and won a natty, having to go through a playoff (not like the old 11-12 game model) and did it with a bunch of rag tag 24 year olds?? Oh and the coaches are all so happy that they don’t have to work all those ridiculous hours??

He’s dirty. Dirty asf.
 
Big O Cane said:
@AUcane

Maybe.. but he’d need to put on about 30lbs in spring and summer. Not impossible but i don’t think he gains weight that easy.

However, year 3 he’ll be a monster.

My guess why he’s not coming is because he sees an easier path to play at AM. All the other stuff is noise.
Click to expand...

Isn't he already 300 and by all accounts, with a thick lower body...

👀
 
AUcane said:
Big O Cane said:
@AUcane

Maybe.. but he’d need to put on about 30lbs in spring and summer. Not impossible but i don’t think he gains weight that easy.

However, year 3 he’ll be a monster.

My guess why he’s not coming is because he sees an easier path to play at AM. All the other stuff is noise.
Click to expand...

I’d say he’s 280 -285 max
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top