brock
All-American
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
- Messages
- 39,513
Knighton explosiveness is elite imoI think he looks better, sure. Not by a good margin tho. I see two similar sized athletes. Knighton is a little faster.
Knighton explosiveness is elite imoI think he looks better, sure. Not by a good margin tho. I see two similar sized athletes. Knighton is a little faster.
Derrick Crudup and Kyle Cobia are the last players we got from Deerfield and Lakeland, respectively. We can't even create drama there. We just have no shot.I mean not like we ever have drama at Columbus right? But honestly out of the 3 he does seem the most realistic
Like what has he done to prove otherwise?
One tore his MCLWhat has Lingard and Davis done?
I like Parrish, but the measurables matter. Columbus clearly had a fantastic OL that opened up holes for him consistently.
Parrish's didn't have all purpose yards, he had over 1,800yds rushing & the fantastic OL that everybody keeps giving all the credit to, go ahead & name me one of them that has offers?Jakhari Gore had 2,000 all purpose yards in a HS season, too.
I like Parrish, but the measurables matter. Columbus clearly had a fantastic OL that opened up holes for him consistently.
Lingard and Harris have been here for one year. I don’t know if you actually watched Miami but Harris flashed a lot with what he shown. So I’m not sure what you’re getting at. Burns hasn’t done anything in Four years so again what are you trying make a point of?What has Lingard and Davis done?
One tore his MCL
And the other averaged 5.9 a carry on 28 touches sooooo....
Lingard and Harris have been here for one year. I don’t know if you actually watched Miami but Harris flashed a lot with what he shown. So I’m not sure what you’re getting at. Burns hasn’t done anything in Four years so again what are you trying make a point of?
Cam Harris doesn’t go by Davis anymore.Whobis this Harris guy you are talking about
Parrish's didn't have all purpose yards, he had over 1,800yds rushing & the fantastic OL that everybody keeps giving all the credit to, go ahead & name me one of them that has offers?
If it was all just the OL how come none of them are 4/5-star prospects?
One tore his ACL and the other in limited opportunities looked like arguably rhe best rb on the rosterWhat has Lingard and Davis done?
Cristobal signed with Georgia State & Federico Maranges signed with FAU, that's it.Great point, I've been thinking this...I mean I'm sure they had a nice OL and Cristobal a decent player...**** probably a top 2 or 3 OL in Dade right? But some monster offensive line huh?
Parrish's didn't have all purpose yards, he had over 1,800yds rushing & the fantastic OL that everybody keeps giving all the credit to, go ahead & name me one of them that has offers?
If it was all just the OL how come none of them are 4/5-star prospects?
He’s a legit 5'10 if not taller. Only issue for me is that he has kind of a skinny frame.
Speed is not an problem from what I could see. His best time as a sophomore was 11.09 in the 100M. That's right in line with Chaney's best time last year, 11.08.
Very interested to see how he tests on Sunday at the Opening.
Do not bother trying to speak the truth to these clowns. There is an excuse for everything. The Parrish haters are out and they can not be reasoned with. If he doesn't run a 4.40 laser timed 40 and a 4.1 shuttle we should not recruit him.He's not 5'9 though & in what way is this a flashback to the Yearby/Cook debate? No one is arguing that Parrish is better than Chaney or Knighton, or Bowman.
The entire argument is that Pareish could be a solid #2 back in this class, that's all it's ever been. We have a more realistic shot at getting Parrish than we do any of the other RB's we're after, not one person has said Parrish would be the best or feature back in this class.
And to your discussion on the OL, bruh... Come on man lol you know **** well if they were really that good a bunch of them would have more offers. Both Chaminade & South Dade has multiple lineman with D1 P5 offers, Columbus's OL is average at best.
I'm not trying to discredit Parrish. He's an outstanding RB and I'm sure he'll be a good college player. I'm getting flashbacks of the Yearby-Cook debates of the past. Yearby was a very solid college RB and IMO through their junior years, a more impressive HS prospect than Parrish. Next level traits are the difference makers here.
He's not 5'9 though & in what way is this a flashback to the Yearby/Cook debate? No one is arguing that Parrish is better than Chaney or Knighton, or Bowman.
The entire argument is that Pareish could be a solid #2 back in this class, that's all it's ever been. We have a more realistic shot at getting Parrish than we do any of the other RB's we're after, not one person has said Parrish would be the best or feature back in this class.
And to your discussion on the OL, bruh... Come on man lol you know **** well if they were really that good a bunch of them would have more offers. Both Chaminade & South Dade has multiple lineman with D1 P5 offers, Columbus's OL is average at best.