k9cane
Senior
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2011
- Messages
- 9,826
I would much rather have Mensah and Barkate, than Seaton and any other QB that was available in the portal. LT is an important position, but not even close to as important an as having the best QB.
And you assume that going after Mensah cost us Seaton. I don’t think there is any correlation. UM most certianly offered Seaton as much as they felt he was worth. The assumption that UM spent so much on Mensah that it meant losing Seaton to LSU is flawed at best, and unsupported by anything but pure speculation.
Dirty doesn’t matter to me if the action falls within the rules. It’s not UM’s moral obligation to impose rules against itself that are more stringent than what the NCAA enforces, or other schools abide by. That would be self defeating and no one is paid to do that.
The current system (for as flawed as it is) is at least one that has a much more level playing field than before. I can live with that
This reminds me of the quote from Charlie Francis, the coach for Ben Johnson, the disgraced Canadian sprinter, on world-class athletics: "It's a level playing field... just not the one you think it's on."