Tears Gator Tears

Advertisement
Advertisement
About the best this team could do through this part of the schedule if we are being honest. Losses to two top 25 teams and wins against the mid teams. Are there 3 more Ws on the schedule? They are better than FSU but not sure where they find two more. UK, LSU and Ole Miss at home. They’ll need to find em in there
 
IMG_9477.jpeg
IMG_9478.jpeg
IMG_9479.jpeg
IMG_9480.jpeg
IMG_9481.jpeg
IMG_9482.jpeg
IMG_9483.jpeg
IMG_9484.jpeg
IMG_9485.jpeg
IMG_9486.jpeg
 
Refs had us 9 penalties for 110 yards. That targeting review was initiated by the booth (not the refs on the field). If the ACC (suddenly) loves us and wants UM to go undefeated, they’ve got a strange way of showing it. Gaytes gonna gayte, though.
 
Refs had us 9 penalties for 110 yards. That targeting review was initiated by the booth (not the refs on the field). If the ACC (suddenly) loves us and wants UM to go undefeated, they’ve got a strange way of showing it. Gaytes gonna gayte, though.
Again I feel like I'm experiencing a mass hysteria event.

Do people hate us that much that they're inventing calls? VT last week. A targeting / holding call this week.
 
Advertisement
Now this is delusion at its finest!! The Acc replay officials are easily able to give us the win from their comfy offices far away!!! Seems like if that was the goal, the replay booth wouldn’t have CALLED FOR THE REVIEW OF TARGETING, which was not called by the refs on the field. If this ridiculous scenario were true, why would they have even risked the controversy by initiating the review?
 
Back
Top