- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 1,507
Doesn’t fsu have 3 conference losses?So could FSU with their one conference loss.
Doesn’t fsu have 3 conference losses?So could FSU with their one conference loss.
Ah, that’s right.Doesn’t fsu have 3 conference losses?
Maybe FSU doesn't count those like the UGA game last year cause they didn't have 100% of their players available for the game. LolDoesn’t fsu have 3 conference losses?
If you guys go 8-5 Napier should keep his job.
If you guys go 8-5 Napier should keep his job.
Napier is back folks. Someone get the banjo
In all seriousness the gayts are gonna go 3 and out on 3 straight coaches right? Mac mullet and billy all got 3 years and the can? Or did Mac get 4 idkYes he’s finding his groove let’s give him time
Again I feel like I'm experiencing a mass hysteria event.Refs had us 9 penalties for 110 yards. That targeting review was initiated by the booth (not the refs on the field). If the ACC (suddenly) loves us and wants UM to go undefeated, they’ve got a strange way of showing it. Gaytes gonna gayte, though.
With all due respect, the gators can suck my properly coiffed log.
Yes yes they do hate us that much. It's a thing of beauty.Again I feel like I'm experiencing a mass hysteria event.
Do people hate us that much that they're inventing calls? VT last week. A targeting / holding call this week.
I wouldn't have it any other way!Yes yes they do hate us that much. It's a thing of beauty.
Now this is delusion at its finest!! The Acc replay officials are easily able to give us the win from their comfy offices far away!!! Seems like if that was the goal, the replay booth wouldn’t have CALLED FOR THE REVIEW OF TARGETING, which was not called by the refs on the field. If this ridiculous scenario were true, why would they have even risked the controversy by initiating the review?