yea then people throw the oh we should beat Duke we have all these 4 stars. But when those 4 stars are complete whiffs they might as well be 0 stars. And their two stars are playing 3 star ball cause we cant play 1 star ball so 2 star is all u needed. Thats why that we have more talent then Duke argument I do not touch cause if your 4 stars are sh who cares if thats what it said coming out of HS, what does it say now.
There's a couple of kids that we wanted from that class too!
Elam, Bogle, Tarquin???
Pierre was a LB and committed to us for a bit and I remember us wanting Zipperer as well.
All jags
Bullets dodged; but we wanted them.
Nah, at this point I think he’s going to play football
That guy may want to see a doctor. Looks like a tumor to me.
Was this the class that 25% of the signees never even played a down at UF?
Our 4 star OL have been no bueno for awhile. Why I’m not concerned with lesser talent there according to rankings with Mario.
We going to see how it plays out cause there been a few tough blue bloods difficult to beat and OSU is one of them. Hopefully these are great evals but need more top heavy so those ordinary dudes can shine with those super talented guys. Makes the game easier and when previous coaches got a high rated pick I just wanted to see who was after them. Most of the time that basically tells the story if those sites possibly got the kid rated too high.
Good point. Even within the 3-star system, you could have a player rated 98 and another 89 and they're both labeled 4 stars. Same thing goes for an 88 and a 80-rated 3 star...You're getting completely different caliber players at each end of the range.
