Funny enough saying “top 200” is legit trying to cope the same way us fans did under previous staffs. Any recruiting junkie could tell you it’s better to sign five top 100 players then ten ranked 150-200 (composite rankings would agree).
UM top 100 signees under Mario? 11
UF top 100 signees under Napier? 6
Doubling them boys up no matter how you cut the cake.
Yep. When they realize top 200 doesn’t hold water some idiot over there is going to say “well, objectively, head to head with top 800 recruits I think SBB might have an edge”
Also note the misuse of objective vs subjective.