I thought Isidora had the overall best game of the OLs. McDermott really struggled pass blocking.
Good work Vision.
Tell the next person who asked you to be brief to go fk their mama.
What a sorry excuse for a reply.. Can you get yourself out of the gutter long enough for your immature mind to from a reply that has some kind of class... Welcome to ignore...
On no, peeved off the forum Den Mother.
Didn't even know you existed before you posted.
So does it matter if you put me on ignore?
Basically, you're the tree in the forest, and I'm another tree who thinks he's funny as **** on a message board at 9:30 in the morning...two states away.
This would be so much better with video
Thanks for the breakdown though! I'm sure it took some time.
[MENTION=5374]HurricaneVision[/MENTION]
Not sure if you want to spend the extra time, probably takes 30seconds per video to make, but you can use gifs.com to turn youtube videos into little gifs. You copy and paste the youtube link of the game into gifs.com, and then set the start and end time. Then you copy and paste the "direct link" of the gif you just created into the "insert image" option on Canesinsight (unclick the retrieve local file separately option if it doesn't immediately work) . This would actually probably be easier than uploading multiple pictures per play, and maybe save you time along with making the game review much better. For example it took me barely over a minute total to make the 3 gifs of the first 3 videos:
This is really cool feedback. I'll see what I can do. I agree gif's would definitely add something to them.
Stills help to capture an exact moment, so I believe there is value there, but I think gifs in certain frames would add more.
I'd like to add graphics to show text and lanes, but it's pretty time consuming as is, so I probably won't be able to do that.
Maybe a better one if/when we beat FSU.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Seems to me that we were focused so much on the dive, we were vulnerable. Sometimes you gotta be satisfied taking one play away.@HurricaneVision Why was GT having so much success on perimeter running plays? Those jet sweeps were getting some chunk yards.
lmao, cancel those subscriptions. bro!
First play of the game and Miami comes out in a 3-4 look. Shaq is tasked solely with the dive play, NT Norton is playing a 1 technique (“shaded” over the C), and Pinckney is off-the-ball. The reason he is off the ball is to keep his speed to allow him to run sideline-to-sideline and far enough away to try to keep linemen out of his legs. True to Diaz’ style, he has his safeties back to help with big plays, as GT hits a larger percentage of “explosive” passing plays as any team on a per-pass basis. GT runs the dive anyway and Norton gets the tackle on a 2-yard run.
-----------------------------------
The more I look at the odd front we used the more it bothers me because I can't understand the benefit of it.
If Norton was so dominant from the 3-4 under and shaded to a 1 tech then why did we use so much 0tech NT with our DEs in the 4 or 5?
All of our tackles were getting blown off the ball at 0tech but Norton. Then the pitches were easy money because our ends were in 4 and 5 tech making it easy af to be blocked down on for the pitch game to have clean lane outside.
Where did you see the benefit of the SPECIFIC odd fronts we used and which look do you think we had the most positive plays out of?