CaneInHeelCountry
Junior
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 1,870
LOL, I knew your lame *** would show up to argue the point.
"Lame ***", ouch. Such hurtful words. Be nice!
Yes, lie and exaggerate. As in "Temple regularly had the top classes in the MAC before upgrading to the AAC."
Funny thing is we're actually in agreement that there's no need to bring up what he did at Temple at all. That was my point exactly. It should be enough to judge him based on his failure at UM instead of having to start threads like this one to lie and exaggerate his faults at Temple. That's not defending him, nitwit.
In one sentence you claim something about recruiting (irrelevant) at the MAC and then one sentence later you say "no need to bring up what he did at Temple at all".
So in the first sentence you bring up some irrelevant point (i.e. talk about his Temple tenure) and in the next sentence you say "no need to bring up what he did at Temple at all." Classic porst and cool beans!
Equally funny that you keep bringing up some old thread that is of no consequence or relevance to anything. But hey, par for the course for you.
I bring it up because you made some amazingly awful porsts and dodged the topic when asked about it. But hey, par for the course for you.
I am such a fan of your ability to duck and dodge a topic. Keep up the good work!
Did you read the freaking thread? I didn't "bring up some irrelevant point." I corrected a lie/exaggeration that another poster set forth. Which gets to my larger point about folks who feel the need to continually lie/exaggerate/bring up Temple instead of focusing on his tenure at UM. We get it--he sucks. He needs to go. Let's move on.
Funny you castigating me when it's obvious your own posts lack any critical thought.