- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 15,430
TIFWIW- put in a lot of articles and takes out there plus the NCAA 20262027 rules into one of the better AI models and here is the reply:
_________________________________________________________________
A lot of people are getting two different issues mixed together here.
Miami did not “block Cam Vaughn from the transfer portal.” The normal football portal is closed right now.
Miami can also dismiss him from the football team for team-rule or conduct issues without formal "explanation" or written notice. That is separate from his scholarship.
The part that might matter is what happened to his athletic aid after he was dismissed. Vaughn is an undergraduate transfer, and NCAA rules give that scholarship certain protections. If Miami canceled it without the required institutional process, Vaughn may have an argument there.
That still does not automatically mean he gets into the portal. Because he's in his first year at Miami, the normal scholarship-cancellation exception may not apply to him. That's apparently why his side wanted Miami to request an NCAA waiver for an out-of-window transfer.
So, simply:
Miami kicked him off the team.
The portal is closed.
Vaughn wanted a waiver to get in anyway based on cancellation of academic aid - which can help him transfer now outside of the portal window if a team actually wants him but not always.
The potentially important legal question is whether Miami properly canceled his scholarship — not whether Miami “refused to let him transfer.”
The other part Miami may care about even more is money. Vaughn is also alleging that promised revenue-share and NIL compensation were not fully honored.
That does not automatically mean Miami owes him the rest of that money. If those agreements contain standard language requiring him to remain on the roster, stay in good standing, follow team rules, or avoid conduct that leads to dismissal, Miami could argue that his own actions terminated any future payment obligations.
That will come down to the actual contract language, which we have not seen.
So the bigger long-term issue for Miami may not be whether Vaughn gets into the portal. It may be whether a dismissed player can still claim future scholarship, revenue-share or NIL money after being removed from the football program for cause but not kicked out formally of the full institution.
For anyone who wants to dig into the NCAA section that may be relevant:
https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/search/proposalView?id=108975
_________________________________________________________________
A lot of people are getting two different issues mixed together here.
Miami did not “block Cam Vaughn from the transfer portal.” The normal football portal is closed right now.
Miami can also dismiss him from the football team for team-rule or conduct issues without formal "explanation" or written notice. That is separate from his scholarship.
The part that might matter is what happened to his athletic aid after he was dismissed. Vaughn is an undergraduate transfer, and NCAA rules give that scholarship certain protections. If Miami canceled it without the required institutional process, Vaughn may have an argument there.
That still does not automatically mean he gets into the portal. Because he's in his first year at Miami, the normal scholarship-cancellation exception may not apply to him. That's apparently why his side wanted Miami to request an NCAA waiver for an out-of-window transfer.
So, simply:
Miami kicked him off the team.
The portal is closed.
Vaughn wanted a waiver to get in anyway based on cancellation of academic aid - which can help him transfer now outside of the portal window if a team actually wants him but not always.
The potentially important legal question is whether Miami properly canceled his scholarship — not whether Miami “refused to let him transfer.”
The other part Miami may care about even more is money. Vaughn is also alleging that promised revenue-share and NIL compensation were not fully honored.
That does not automatically mean Miami owes him the rest of that money. If those agreements contain standard language requiring him to remain on the roster, stay in good standing, follow team rules, or avoid conduct that leads to dismissal, Miami could argue that his own actions terminated any future payment obligations.
That will come down to the actual contract language, which we have not seen.
So the bigger long-term issue for Miami may not be whether Vaughn gets into the portal. It may be whether a dismissed player can still claim future scholarship, revenue-share or NIL money after being removed from the football program for cause but not kicked out formally of the full institution.
For anyone who wants to dig into the NCAA section that may be relevant:
https://web3.ncaa.org/lsdbi/search/proposalView?id=108975
Last edited:
