You continually speak out of both sides of your mouth dude. You talk about us being "lucky" and "contractually required" to do things that put us at #2 with 15 ranked teams, then drop South Carolina/Clemson and Georgia/GT as some kind of bold move, scheduling prowess or even a valid comparison.
FSU is that game for us, regardless of affiliation. Aside from that Georgia, South Carolina and UF historically don't and wouldn't play any team with a pulse unless they absolutely had to in a bowl game.
We've scheduled Ohio State, Nebraska, Bama, Michigan State, LSU, Kansas State and Texas A&M just this decade. And never forget, for whatever the reason, the Turds dropped us just to add a cup cake every year, not vice versa.
Who else has done anything remotely like that until the SOS became such a big deal in the last few years.
No, dopey, I'm not "speaking out of both sides of my mouth".
I realize that you can't comprehend logic very easily, so I'll make it very simple for a simpleton such as yourself.
"Lucky" is what puts Miami higher on that list than Clemson. Miami played 20 P5 games, and 14 opponents were ranked (70%). Clemson played 28 P5 games, and 13 were ranked (under 50%). Clemson played a MUCH TOUGHER slate of OOC teams overall, but is lower on the list, based solely on the luck of the draw, since those games are scheduled years in advance. If you don't understand that, then you are hopeless.
And the "contractually obligated" games argument is to point out that Blake (and Shermanator and Hocvnt before him) are not doing a very good job of scheduling. I'm not saying DON'T play Notre Dame, I'm just pointing out that it isn't a huge stretch to add teams like "Pitt" and "Louisville" (teams that might not even really qualify as P5 teams at the time we played them as OOC games) when you are forced to do so. Additionally, it might not be as challenging to get LSU (or Alabama in the future) to agree to a pre-season game, but we need to make the effort to get those teams to play a home-and-home with Miami.
As for you whining about me 100% accurate postings, you have now inflated Miami's 14 games against ranked P5 teams to 15. And one of those games was against #12 Louisville in 2006 when they were in the decimated, left-behind Big Least. So, in truth, Miami probably shouldn't get credit for that, and then it's 13 games and we are ranked with "only schedules one P5 opponent per year" Clemson.
Again, you try to minimize actual, factual truths. If UF-F$U-UGa-GaTech-Clemson-SC were the "only play 1 P5 OOC game" teams, then you might have a point about "contractual obligations".
But the reality is that it proves those schools are even tougher than Miami because they already know that they have one guaranteed P5 OOC opponent.
I already proved that Clemson played 28 ****-good P5 opponents in 15 years.
F$U has also played 28 ****-good P5 opponents in 15 years (and, yes, I am going to count BYU as well as ND, two independent religious schools that have won national championships, and BYU was even ranked #9 one of the times they played F$U). F$U has played OOC games against Syracuse, Colorado, Alabama, BYU, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and Ole Miss IN ADDITION TO PLAYING UF ANNUALLY.
So stop comparing Miami to everyone else to justify our scheduling laziness. Miami scheduled 20 P5 games IN TOTAL in 15 years. Clemson and F$U scheduled 13 IN ADDITION TO THEIR ANNUAL P5 RIVALRY GAMES.
Stop justifying our bad scheduling.
And as for your "list", you don't get to simultaneously go backwards and forwards in time. And it's a bit of a stretch to try to use 11 football seasons to put the last Ohio Taint game in the "same decade" as the future Alabama game.
But, hey, keep pulling those stats from the Hecht Center to defend Boy Blake.