- Joined
- Dec 30, 2013
- Messages
- 3,083
Guys, read this Mark Emmert piece:
" Emmert is concerned that a "patchwork" of state laws would cause student-athletes to pick schools based on where they can make the most money and give some athletic programs an unequal recruiting advantage. "
But he's not concerned about the 1 million cases for bags being thrown at players. Emmert is OK with players being paid, so long as it was under his control. Makes you wonder, did Emmert have something against Miami? Crazy how the power shift went to the SEC when Emmert cracked down on Miami. Alabama, Georgia, and Clemson have flourished these past few years and it's not crazy to wonder why.
Why couldn't Antifa have raided the NCAA building? RIP to all my brothers, but this is the **** that needs to be protested. Vilma get's an A+ in by book for helping advocate this.
For the last 50 years, players or teams who didn't fit the NCAA's image of what a team should be have been shytted on with unequivocal oversight.
That piece of **** can be concerned all he wants. Nothing his *** will be able to do about it now.
I don't wonder if he had anything against Miami, I know it.
This is such a big W. Players now can make money here and that money will go back into the community. They can show their earnings to high schoolers here as another recruiting tool. Miami will be the it place to be. Only USC will be able to benefit as much as Miami in all this IMO