I get the criticism. If you go top-down, from elite teams like Clemson and Bama to where we're at today, we're several positions away from being competitive. And if King is having a bad day, every game in the mediocre ACC will be a one-or-two possession type game. We "should" still win those, but it will be rough going and we could easily lose.
But the optimist in me looks at this bottom up vs. a 6-7 2019 team:
* Better OC and offensive coaching staff
---
* Better at QB
* Better at OL
* Deeper and slightly better at RB
* Better at TE (because Jordan is Jordan, but Mallory is emerging)
---
* Equivalent Strong FL play (DEs a slight degradation offset by Silvera emerging as a disruptive force inside)
* Better at Safety
* Equivalent at Striker
* Equivalent play at CB and improving now that Couch is coming on
---
* Better at kicking
* Better at punting (Hedley took another step during the off season)
---
The two places we're worse, and it's a huge issue, are wide receiver and linebacker situation. At WR, Osborn was more reliable than anyone we have playing right now, as the leader of an underwhelming group last year. At LB, Shaq and Pinck were already a little stiff and slow. But they looked like All Pros vs. McCloud and Jennings. Hopefully the increased snap counts by the young WRs and Brooks means this gets better.
So, overall, the team is unquestionably better than the team that lost to FIU, La Tech, Ga Tech, UNC and Duke last year. But it's not a dominant team by any stretch of the imagination.
We still "should" go 10-1.