- Joined
- Jan 22, 2021
- Messages
- 5,564
Can you point to multiple coordinators hired by Lanning who weren't up to the task or a couple of games where Oregon **** the bed? Because that's why people had their opinion on Nov 30, 2024 when this thread was started. At that point, Oregon was #1 and beat Washington 49-21 and we, the #6 team in the country, blew a 21-0 lead to lose to lowly Syracuse.This is just semantic gymnastics and moving the goalposts to avoid admitting the take was premature.
You qualify that Lanning was better 'early but Mario is better now'; that's not the premise of the thread (Lanning is better than Mario). In fact, it's a perfect example of the "cap/spin/whitewashing" you mention. Your effort to decouple staff turnover from roster turnover is an entirely unrealistic way to look at program building. No coach in America—not Saban, not Smart, not anyone—has a 100% hit rate on assistants during a total teardown.
Bumping threads to point out that people panicked, made premature declarations of coaching superiority based on Year 1 and 2 growing pains, and were ultimately proven wrong by Year 4 isn't 'reigniting divisions'—it's just stating facts.
This thread was an emotional react to a loss that shouldn't have happened the same way it had happened the prior two seasons. Look at how many stupid threads have been started about which game we should win but will lose before the season starts.