forums

Fermaninator says get your Adidas Cane gear

Advertisement
dfreshhookup said:
$3M MORE than what Nike is offering us would be an absolute monster deal, probably one of the biggest in college sports. Nike pays schools pretty cheap.

This year FSU got $4,400,000 from Nike, Alabama got $3,570,000 and Ohio State got $4,164,014.

On the flipside Adidas pays big, $8,200,000 to Michigan this year, $7,500,000 to UCLA, $6,375,000 to Kansas, $5,550,000 to Tennessee.

Auburn and Maryland are getting $4,300,000 from UA.
Click to expand...

Nike is the top tier brand.
 
Problem2 said:
Cane Dynasty said:
Problem2 said:
ASU just got 33 million to switch to Adidas.

What happens when Miami gets more and people still think they are poor?
Click to expand...




What happens when Miami gets more and then the Admin still refuses to pay Gorlden's buyout?
Click to expand...

picture-5.png
Click to expand...

spot on. i instantly had the same image in my mind when i read that
 
dfreshhookup said:
$3M MORE than what Nike is offering us would be an absolute monster deal, probably one of the biggest in college sports. Nike pays schools pretty cheap.

This year FSU got $4,400,000 from Nike, Alabama got $3,570,000 and Ohio State got $4,164,014.

On the flipside Adidas pays big, $8,200,000 to Michigan this year, $7,500,000 to UCLA, $6,375,000 to Kansas, $5,550,000 to Tennessee.

Auburn and Maryland are getting $4,300,000 from UA.
Click to expand...

It only matters if we spend it on athletics (football), it is bullchit if they spend it on the hospital or some non-athletic purpose.
 
King Slayer said:
dfreshhookup said:
$3M MORE than what Nike is offering us would be an absolute monster deal, probably one of the biggest in college sports. Nike pays schools pretty cheap.

This year FSU got $4,400,000 from Nike, Alabama got $3,570,000 and Ohio State got $4,164,014.

On the flipside Adidas pays big, $8,200,000 to Michigan this year, $7,500,000 to UCLA, $6,375,000 to Kansas, $5,550,000 to Tennessee.

Auburn and Maryland are getting $4,300,000 from UA.
Click to expand...

Nike is the top tier brand.
Click to expand...

No debate there, but we will get a lot more outside of Nike when it comes to the dollars and cents part of sponsorships.
 
They should ask your beloved Coach L what he thinks about this. Apparel brand is much more important in basketball recruiting than football
 
dfreshhookup said:
King Slayer said:
dfreshhookup said:
$3M MORE than what Nike is offering us would be an absolute monster deal, probably one of the biggest in college sports. Nike pays schools pretty cheap.

This year FSU got $4,400,000 from Nike, Alabama got $3,570,000 and Ohio State got $4,164,014.

On the flipside Adidas pays big, $8,200,000 to Michigan this year, $7,500,000 to UCLA, $6,375,000 to Kansas, $5,550,000 to Tennessee.

Auburn and Maryland are getting $4,300,000 from UA.
Click to expand...

Nike is the top tier brand.
Click to expand...

No debate there, but we will get a lot more outside of Nike when it comes to the dollars and cents part of sponsorships.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if we don't spend it on athletics (football).
 
Advertisement
Consigliere said:
dfreshhookup said:
King Slayer said:
dfreshhookup said:
$3M MORE than what Nike is offering us would be an absolute monster deal, probably one of the biggest in college sports. Nike pays schools pretty cheap.

This year FSU got $4,400,000 from Nike, Alabama got $3,570,000 and Ohio State got $4,164,014.

On the flipside Adidas pays big, $8,200,000 to Michigan this year, $7,500,000 to UCLA, $6,375,000 to Kansas, $5,550,000 to Tennessee.

Auburn and Maryland are getting $4,300,000 from UA.
Click to expand...

Nike is the top tier brand.
Click to expand...

No debate there, but we will get a lot more outside of Nike when it comes to the dollars and cents part of sponsorships.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if we don't spend it on athletics (football).
Click to expand...

And basketball and baseball.
 
dfreshhookup said:
Consigliere said:
dfreshhookup said:
King Slayer said:
dfreshhookup said:
$3M MORE than what Nike is offering us would be an absolute monster deal, probably one of the biggest in college sports. Nike pays schools pretty cheap.

This year FSU got $4,400,000 from Nike, Alabama got $3,570,000 and Ohio State got $4,164,014.

On the flipside Adidas pays big, $8,200,000 to Michigan this year, $7,500,000 to UCLA, $6,375,000 to Kansas, $5,550,000 to Tennessee.

Auburn and Maryland are getting $4,300,000 from UA.
Click to expand...

Nike is the top tier brand.
Click to expand...

No debate there, but we will get a lot more outside of Nike when it comes to the dollars and cents part of sponsorships.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter if we don't spend it on athletics (football).
Click to expand...

And basketball and baseball.
Click to expand...

I agree. But it doesn't matter unless we spend it wisely.
 
I was shocked when ND switched to UA.

I don't really think it matters too much in football. I actually think Addidas did some real cool things with unis this year with AtM, UCLA, Louisville and TAMU. Yeah they don't have a big portion of the market but they're obviously trying to get into it.

What's the big deal? Nike also has made some horrid uni designs.
 
Think y'all are being a bit dramatic. Adidas is still a huge brand. Derrick Rose, Dwight Howard just to name a couple
 
Advertisement
AUcane said:
I was shocked when ND switched to UA.

I don't really think it matters too much in football. I actually think Addidas did some real cool things with unis this year with AtM, UCLA, Louisville and TAMU. Yeah they don't have a big portion of the market but they're obviously trying to get into it.

What's the big deal? Nike also has made some horrid uni designs.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Nike makes some really nice stuff but they also make stuff that is terrible. Adidas is also not nearly as bad as people think. Louisville and A&M unis were dope and A&M had my favorite unis of the year when they went all white with a chrome logo. LOVED that uni.
 
I'd love to get involved with Under Armour, but there's no way they want to be involved with the ACC going foward I'd imagine.
 
Consigliere said:
Before I comment, I would like to know more about the financials.

So maybe Dapper or someone else with knowledge can answer the following.

1. How much do we currently make with Nike?

2. How much of that is a base versus from a split?

3. What kind of split do we have currently (Nike gets X and we get Y)?


It's not all financials but I would love to know more about the financials.
Click to expand...

Anyone
 
mjackson6 said:
Just looked at the list of adidas sponsored schools and there is not one elite team, nor one elite recruiting team. Miss st, Wisconsin, Nebraska, UCLA, thats about it. I seriously think this switch would kill recruiting
Click to expand...

Texas A&M, Michigan, and Louisville are all addidas schools to. Tennessee has been for a long time but is about to switch.


UCLA, Texas A&M, Tennessee and Michigan all recruit at a very high level. A brand switch won't kill recruiting but not switching coaches will.
 
Back
Top