Its a misconception to think that Baylor went from a struggling program to one that was successful simply due to a retrenchment & renewal managerial philosophy. They won because the administration embraced a "win at all costs mentality" by emboldening a coach who was more than willing to break rules. MIA will never again adopt that type of mentality like it did in the 80's. Furthermore Baylor is currently 3a or 3b in football spending in the entire BigXII, and the only schools that are ahead in spending are Texas & OU. If Baylor was in the ACC they would have the highest football spending as a % of overall revenue in the entire conference. Even higher than Clemson & FSU.
It should come as no surprise that Texas football is the most lucrative program in the Big 12.
www.cnhinews.com
To reiterate there is absolutely no comparison between MIA and other private schools in CFB like ND, USC, Baylor, & TCU. Those schools all spend more on football either because they are simply more profitable or because they possess a greater will to field a successful football program. Therefore it is more than obvious that the issues affecting UM football go much deeper than simply hiring a new AD or HC, which btw is already occurring in a turnstile fashion. The issues plaguing the football program have everything to do with institutional & systemic failure. The only people who fail to see that are dyck sucking, biased, delusional alumni of this bankrupt, pos university. Real/True fans who are objective are able to look at things from a macro level and temper expectations by refusing to spread negativity/toxicity because they realize it is counterproductive.