I promise u, I’m not coming at u. U make a reasonable point, but u’re missing a big element:
It doesn’t have to be either or. Texas A&M have ridiculous facilities, & they also have a ridiculous NIL situation. Bama has outstanding facilities, & they also have a strong NIL program.
Pls understand, NFL teams heavily invest in their facilities, & believe it or not, that does play a role in FA. Some guys are geared towards money, but there’s a good majority that want the money ANNNND go to a stable team b/c they want to win. I can tell u as we speak the LA Chargers r in the midst of building a revolutionary sports complex not too far from the stadium. I can tell u that when The Rams owner built his stadium, he wanted it to be a center piece for entertainment & attract FA’s.
These guys r spending majority of their playing careers in facilities, so yes eye candy matter. But just remember, companies who r getting involved w/ these NILs want to be associated w/ winners. They r looking to profit off this, too. Rad’s job is to eliminate as many recruiting obstacles as possibles, while making this school attractive to one’s who want to invest.
Just like I preached we don’t have to “E before W”, we can have both; in like manner we don’t have to choose upgrading facilities or NIL, we can do both.