Right? We "lost" because we didn't get any guys they gave us a 0% chance of getting in the first place.Which is hilarious since they didn't have us in the top 2-3 schools of any of our nsd targets.
To be fair they said signing day which is that specific day not a week month or whole year.....and there rightRight? We "lost" because we didn't get any guys they gave us a 0% chance of getting in the first place.
I agree that we lost the day, but that's because I thought we had a chance. They didn't really have us in the running, so how could we have lost?To be fair they said signing day which is that specific day not a week month or whole year.....and there right
Because we wasted alot of resources recruiting PS2 TC Chatman and Chatfield, we struck out that days the most. ESPN expects us to get sfla kids and its a loss because where those kids are from especially the AH3. Thats y we failed that day, most fans went into the day thinking we had a chance but we never did.I agree that we lost the day, but that's because I thought we had a chance. They didn't really have us in the running, so how could we have lost?
that sounds like an RCT Man there...lolESPiN can suck an aids infested d!ck
that sounds like an RCT Man there...lol
Very strange to hate on Miami, but outside of Coburn and Chatman, Miami wasn't in it for really anyone else. Surtain was a courtesy visit. Campbell had long been gone from the picture.
I'm not sure how ESPN can really justify being a loser on NSD. I can see pointing out Miami's failures in not getting them at all, but thats a story that should have been printed a long time ago.