ESPN drop Pope to #35 rank WR and raised Schwartz to #7 overall Wr and #46 overall player in the country. Crazy stuff. They did however raise Jordan to #20 overall prospect so maybe he does get a 5th star in the composit.
Link
ESPN Football Recruiting - Player Rankings - ESPN
Lingard at 60 is laughable as well
Lingard at 60 is laughable as well
so, in summary, all of our recruits should be in top 20? You think all fanbases obsess over rankings this way? Cause every year it seems we do this but don't end up with 3-4 first round picks...........
Sad that they base a lot of there ranking on who did well in there UA practices and game.
but, didnt pope dominate and end up starting in the all star game?
Sad that they base a lot of there ranking on who did well in there UA practices and game.
but, didnt pope dominate and end up starting in the all star game?
Yes he did in the Army game not the under armour game that is on espn.
i don't think espn even watches half of these recruits
No way Scaife should be below Reed.
I like both, both are Canes, but how can ESPN watch both at UA week? Then the game? Still rank Reed over Scaife?
Lingard at 60 is laughable as well
so, in summary, all of our recruits should be in top 20? You think all fanbases obsess over rankings this way? Cause every year it seems we do this but don't end up with 3-4 first round picks...........
ESPN drop Pope to #35 rank WR and raised Schwartz to #7 overall Wr and #46 overall player in the country. Crazy stuff. They did however raise Jordan to #20 overall prospect so maybe he does get a 5th star in the composit.
Link
ESPN Football Recruiting - Player Rankings - ESPN
If the 247 composite is up to date, Jordan just missed his 5th star even tho he is ranked as the #32 overall prospect. Pope is also way down.
ESPN got Nesta and Jordan right, but **** man. How do you rank Pope and Scaife that low. Particularly Scaife who absolutely dominated UA practices and game.