Your skull must really be thick.
You really swung hard here. I am really concerned that your next insult will really put me in my place.
Please note: When you don't answer my questions or address an issue, I am going to assume you don't have any retort.
Standards of evidence don’t matter to the NCAA, as they have proven time and again.
That is my point. What standard is there when there is no evidence? If you actually care, I suggest you actually familiarize yourself with the criminal proceeding. There was no evidence.
I am waiting for your thoughts on VJ King and Lamar Peters.
I’m assuming you didn’t follow the whole Shapiro mess very closely, and everything that came out about what the NCAA’s intentions were regarding Miami.
I am very familiar with it. I agree that was a witch hunt but nothing there was similar to here. Here we had a criminal court, with actual subpoena power do an investigation. They found NO EVIDENCE. There the NCAA did the investigation and...we know what happened. So like I said, what could the NCAA possibly find that a criminal court couldn't find.
There's enough to criticize the program without this nonsense. I would do exactly the same thing as far as Dewan...until the NCAA gives the green light, which they HAVE NOT, you can’t risk playing him. Simple as that. They have a history of wanting the come down hard on us. A provable history.
All of these things were already discussed in that thread.
1. Criticize the program, seriously? This is that puzsy bull**** attitude that explains why our program is where it is. Who cares?
2. Miami and Coach L were already cleared and removed from the indictment. There was no evidence presented at trial, as previously stated. In addition, there is the whole part about Peters and King. I guess Louisville, a program that has multiple issues before the NCAA (not including this one), has nothing to risk.
3. By not playing Dewan, we're not supporting our players. If Dewan says he is clean and there
was no actual evidence, what risk is there? If Dewan took money, he would have left and been overseas playing ball. This is all illogical reasoning why they're sitting Dewan. In addition, if the school knew of actual evidence, they would have given it to the DOJ during the investigation.
4. Who knows what Dewan is actually doing? He may receive bad advice, he may not know his options, he may be ignorant. I don't know. He would be wise to talk to DeQuan Jones and Jason Setchen because that was the way to go the second this bull**** started.
5. Our program has a tremendous track record of incompetence and over-reactive, irrational and illogical decision making. We do it wrong. We just do it wrong. If you want a "provable history" just look at our track record. Craig Anderson, Blake James and the rest of those ***** got this wrong too. But hey, we're consistent.
That’s the only reason they’re not playing him. They’re afraid that the NCAA will hammer them if they do.
But they also created an issue after being cleared of said issue by the DOJ. At UM, we do it wrong.
Side notes: We lost our last 3 games by sitting Dewan. The season and the only actual coach at UM with real success suffer as we act like a bunch of scared *****.
I’m done, you clearly don’t get it, and any kind of logic apparently escapes you.
Did you read the **** you just porsted? You should be done for a different reason.
