Eddie Johnson suspended vs UVA

[sebastian91]

This is not a difficult concept to understand. Every team has rules. Players must follow those rules to play. When a player CHOOSES to break those rules, coachspeak says that the player CHOSE not to travel and play via breaking the rules. It was EJ's decision to break the rules, and he was held accountable for it (as well as other players who broke the rules).

 

[lauderdaleballer]

EJ needs to get his act together...

 

[Angry Ibis]

This is not a difficult concept to understand. Every team has rules. Players must follow those rules to play. When a player CHOOSES to break those rules, coachspeak says that the player CHOSE not to travel and play via breaking the rules. It was EJ's decision to break the rules, and he was held accountable for it (as well as other players who broke the rules).

Incredibly sad that you had to spell this out.

Maybe next time you can use pictures and crayons to help people understand.

 

[Notsince1985]

This is not a difficult concept to understand. Every team has rules. Players must follow those rules to play. When a player CHOOSES to break those rules, coachspeak says that the player CHOSE not to travel and play via breaking the rules. It was EJ's decision to break the rules, and he was held accountable for it (as well as other players who broke the rules).

So Eddie chose to break the rules, but Scott was suspended?

 

[sebastian91]

This is not a difficult concept to understand. Every team has rules. Players must follow those rules to play. When a player CHOOSES to break those rules, coachspeak says that the player CHOSE not to travel and play via breaking the rules. It was EJ's decision to break the rules, and he was held accountable for it (as well as other players who broke the rules).

So Eddie chose to break the rules, but Scott was suspended?

Was AG asked specifically about Scott? Or King? If he were, he would've said the same thing.

 

[Notsince1985]

This is not a difficult concept to understand. Every team has rules. Players must follow those rules to play. When a player CHOOSES to break those rules, coachspeak says that the player CHOSE not to travel and play via breaking the rules. It was EJ's decision to break the rules, and he was held accountable for it (as well as other players who broke the rules).

So Eddie chose to break the rules, but Scott was suspended?

Was AG asked specifically about Scott? Or King? If he were, he would've said the same thing.

I'm pretty sure they came out today and said Scott was suspended. I'm pretty sure they said Johnson was "left at home."

Edit: This from the Herald:

Eddie "didn't do what he needed to do to make the trip,'' according to UM director of communications Chris Yandle. That explanation came when I asked if Eddie was suspended.

Rashawn Scott, however, has been suspended -- and indefinitely.

 

[Ispyin]

This is not a difficult concept to understand. Every team has rules. Players must follow those rules to play. When a player CHOOSES to break those rules, coachspeak says that the player CHOSE not to travel and play via breaking the rules. It was EJ's decision to break the rules, and he was held accountable for it (as well as other players who broke the rules).

So Eddie chose to break the rules, but Scott was suspended?

Was AG asked specifically about Scott? Or King? If he were, he would've said the same thing.

My guess, and only a guess though informed by history, is E Johnson broke a team rule, CHOSE not to travel by ******** up and missing practice, and that perhaps Scott did something more serious and UNIVERSITY enforced or NCAA enforced thing that required suspension (puff puff perhaps as an example- not saying this is it, don't know)

 

[TheUnuffSAID]