- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
- Messages
- 946
yep. Baker and Patke too. He protects his under qualified boys well.You better believe Manny would get Reed fired before he fires Banda.
yep. Baker and Patke too. He protects his under qualified boys well.You better believe Manny would get Reed fired before he fires Banda.
Okay good, I'm not the only oneI fail to understand what is controversial about his use of an emoji. Baker (kinda) called out the CBs, which I appreciated, and praised the safeties. Ed blushed, what on earth is the issue?
If anyone Baker stepped up, and Ed merely reacted. What am I missing?
It's cryptic in that it could apply to the CBs or S or both. I'm a fan of just saying what you mean instead of expressing yourself like a 13 year old girl with hieroglyphics. I appreciate Ed's attempt at being demanding, but a little red cartoon face falls a bit short.It’s honestly not very cryptic. I’m just saying he should have said what he wanted to say.
Can you be more specific? Is it mainly the coaching or players the alumni are not happy with?No it's not...Ed don't like what he sees...neither does other former Canes...
Are his days numbered?
Ragone played 6 snaps.
Someone texted it to me when it happened to laugh at some fan pretending Ed was attacking Baker. I still do not understand what people are seeing in this emoji. It’s not even a or , which still without context don’t mean anything.Okay good, I'm not the only one
How can you infer that’s what Reed means from an emoji that looks like he supports what Baker said?The greats know a fraud when they see one.
Yeah to a teenager that’s an entire smear campaignI agree with saying what you mean, but maybe he's speaking 18 year old by using the emoji. Maybe that stupid face speaks more loudly to the players than words.
Banda is better off making us all drinks.I'm not as down on Baker as others but if there's another 2019 VT game then maybe let Banda call the plays. He's already Co-DC.
This is exactly why grown men shouldn't speak in emoji. There are already 20 different interpretations on here as to what he meant when he could have just said what he meant in a single sentence. If the emoji is an embarrassed face he should say what he's embarrassed about or who is embarrassing.I took it as he was agreeing with Baker about the below average play, and was expressing his own agreement and dissatisfaction with their play.
I thought about for the five seconds it took to post this, and I shall never speak of it again.
Please resume your overreacting opinions and reading way too much into this.
Is that what that emoji means? Agreement? I have honestly no idea.How can you infer that’s what Reed means from an emoji that looks like he supports what Baker said?