CaneFan79
Senior
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2013
- Messages
- 3,844
Duke game tommorrow and last year's horribly officiated game AGAINST Miami (PI on an interception?!?...Never mind, the same penalty was called against Miami again this year!) made me want to bring to light a 2015 paper from The MIT Sloan School of Management on the Referee Bias issue. It's written by two reseachers who would definitely not be biased towards the 'Canes; one is from the other Miami (you know, the one that touts itself as a "Public Ivy" despite their 65% admission rate) and the other from Felonies Smothered University. Indeed, they crack on UM's "laundry list of impermissible benefits" in Paragraph 2. But play particular attention to Paras 4 & 5 and the Conclusions in Para 6:
http://www.sloansportsconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/SSAC15-RP-Poster-Paper-Referee-Analytics.pdf
Yes, its not a Doctoral Dissertation, but to dispute ACC Ref bias (especially by a Tobacco Road partisan) is being intellectually dishonest (no pun intended UNC).
http://www.sloansportsconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/SSAC15-RP-Poster-Paper-Referee-Analytics.pdf
Yes, its not a Doctoral Dissertation, but to dispute ACC Ref bias (especially by a Tobacco Road partisan) is being intellectually dishonest (no pun intended UNC).
Last edited: