There's an old saying when a QB is in the pocket, scanning the field. They call it standing tall in the pocket. King, no matter how hard he tries, will NEVER stand tall in the pocket and be able to see the field. He relies of throwing lanes, and if those aren't there, he just can't see. Now I love what King can do, so I am not nitpicking. What I want to see is Lashlee use him correctly, because every team we face will sell out to stop the run, which luckily for them also takes away throwing lanes. We are doomed if Lashlee can't find a way to get King to see the field.That’s what 5’9 will do. It is what it is.
Lashlee is working with a Barely average Oline and Very bad WR core.. He had better WRs at SMU. King is wildly inaccurate and struggles to throw under pressure. It's year 1 of Lashlee Offense, it will take time to get it where he wants.
Yeah when were playing against a team Where our OL can block and our WRs get separation his scheme works perfectlyAll of this. You can't complain our wrs can't get separation, our oline is pedestrian, our qb inconsistent, and then blame the OC who still has us averaging 30+ a game.
If that is true then he needs to be more creative and get King in his comfort zone.Guy has no confidence in King to throw or our receivers to catch so
I'd say throwing TD passes consistently to running backs and Tight ends is scheming around our weakness at wr. Wtf else do you want him to do. We are 4-1 and your acting like richt or enos is oc.True but I'd assert it's difficult for any OC to effectively scheme around a receiving corps this poor
No. We want a 6'4" guy who can stand in the pocket AND run.I'VE been saying that all day. Too short and can't throw a spiral. He's more suited for the tripple option. Or the wish bone. We at the UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI want POCKET PASSER and at least 6'4. That's it. Bring in TVD. on mop ups
Put sum R’pect on Rosiers nameI'll stick with my previous comparison I made of King from Week 1, which is he is a superior version of Malik Rosier.
And that's not a bad thing, actually.
Maybe. Then again, WRs need to fight for the ball, and I haven't seen that. They just don't. Sure the other team makes plays, but if the ball doesn't just drop in their hands, our WRs simply give up on it.The common denominator on the deep balls to all the different WRs is King. He throws a HORRIBLE deep ball! He heaves it so hard and the motion is so long. He looks like a kid throwing a grown mans ball. And it goes straight in the air and the WRs have to wait and wait and wait and wait. Have to slow down to catch his ducks. Nothing is in stride. The passes to Wiggins and smith were broken up, not dropped because they have to slow down so much and the defender catches up and breaks it up. Gotta give your guys a chance out there.
Yeah, that's great, but when that's your base offense people figure it out like they figured out the other sht. Those guys are mismatches and successful because it's not the only thing we do. It isn't the first thing we do. Mallory got free on that second score because we weren't featuring him all game. Had we tossed it to him a bunch they wouldn't have lost sight of him so easily.I think Lashlee has been good so far but I have one criticism.
Good coaches adjust their scheme to the talent they have in their available inventory. You'd have to be a certified MORON to not recognize we are completely DEVOID of any type of difference making ability at WR. You'd also have to be a moron to NOT realize our two best receivers are both tight ends.
It's time to make the Ace formation the BASE formation for this offense. Run it out of the gun if you want, but Mallory AND Jordan need to be on the field TOGETHER, for the ENTIRE game. There's also a chance it might help the run game get going.
I have spoken.