That's evidence of what he and donof were able to put together. Him running grohs D is inconsequential to our situation.
what did they put together you mouth breather? you are propping up two decent defenses that played really terrible teams as some sort of evidence that these idiots are some defensive gurus.
you look like a raging ******
yet i always seem to be on the right side of these arguments..... again, you lack perespective... the 16th and 12th ranked defense is better than just 'decent' ...and maybe that wouldnt be great with bamas roster...but with the guys that temple was bringing in, thats pretty **** good
really? according to who?
what is the 16th and 12th ranking a measure of? points given up? yards?
there are many different measures of defensive performance. another one that is very indicative of performance is yards per play and these defenses of F.A.G.s are AWFUL by that measure
I'm stepping in on this one. Bigtip, relax. You're wrong. This is supposed to be a civilized discussion. I've seen you on nearly every active thread insulting people.
It's widely recognized that scoring defense is the most telling stat. At the end of the day, points on the scoreboard are what matter the most. That's pretty much universal. Gary Patterson's system is know for it's attacking style, but it's his philosophy that if they're good enough, they going to play base all game. Alabama has the same philosophy.