forums

Does Wake get in at 11-2?

They'll be in the mix. Ton of variables in/out.

Wake is a good team. But the ACC schedule is sneaky. We've been there. Its not even Halloween yet. Spooky szn...

On the road...1030pm EST against Cal will be a rock fight.

Beware the 2w lull in October...UVA comes to town right after.

On the road v SMU, Georgia Tech and then Manny Diaz hiding right around the corner after Turkey Day?


Wakes got some work to do.
 
Screenshot_20261011_195403_Firefox.jpg


Everyone is getting ****ed by the SEC bias.

Even their chief colluders in the PCSA, the B1G.

 
Last edited:
LuCane said:
Are you insane? After the sure bets of Georgia, Bama, and Texas, the committee needs room for Kentucky, Missouri, TAMU, LSU, and maybe even UF. ND obviously gets an automatic bid, as per contract. Then the Big10 gets two. We'll be lucky to get in ourselves.
Click to expand...
TAMU and UF? What are you smoking?
 
Alabama demolishes Miss St, Miss St. drops 1 spot. Now Alabama loses to UGA, Alabama stays in the same spot. They're just rigging it to get whatever SEC teams they want in at large at the end of the year. This new BS where even losses don't count against a team they like because they say so should be the death of the AP poll.
 
Bearly said:
A 2 loss non conference champion will not make it unless it’s Miami. Thats the only way the ACC gets 2.

Edit: and that might be pushing it.
Click to expand...
Agreed. And that would require a one possession loss to ND and getting screwed in the ACC championship by a blatant bad call by the Tobacco Road Mafia
 
SaiyaMan305 said:
The real question is do we get in with 2 losses if we lose to ND and Wake in the ACC championship
Click to expand...
The other real question is if we lose a close game to ND to we stay at 3 like Bama stayed at 6 losing a close game to UGA???

Of course not, they’ll drop us behind IU, OSU and Bama off the bat and probably 3 more schools
 
drewm3i said:
You guys are goofy - for one, Wake is not only going to lose two games. Secondly, a lot of the other teams being mentioned - UK, UF, Mizzou, OU, etc. - will lose three or four games and barely be ranked by the end (if at all), much less make the playoffs.
Click to expand...
All of those teams should make the playoffs. Doesn’t matter how many losses they have. They’re basically a division of the NFL.
 
I mentioned in another thread that I think there will be multiple SEC teams with 3 losses. At least one will get their third loss in the SEC championship game and another team will also have 3 losses and not make their championship game.

Polls are dumb before October. It poisons the well.
 
Invalid Username said:
No chance. ACC is a 1 team bid
Click to expand...
Unless Miami runs the table and somehow were to lose in the ACC Chip. Miami wouldn’t be penalized ( dropped from CFP).
In that example committee would be forced to make sure to have Miami no worse than 9
Example:
9. MIAMI
10. 2 or 3 loss SEC (Texas)
11. Wake
12. ND

Group of 12 team then replaces a 10 seeded 2 or 3 loss SEC team.

SEC would have a stroke in that scenario.
 
If we’re undefeated and #1, they definitely deserve to be. But you know they’re gonna put a 9-3 Texas and/or Ole Miss because of all those fake *** “quality losses”
 
rascon said:
.

Polls are dumb.
Click to expand...
FIFY - polls are a relic of a bygone age, which should be done away with. Results/seedlings should be settled on the field. Conference championship games should be eliminated in favor of play-in games for automatic bids. At-large bids and seeding should be determined by efficiency metrics, head-to-head, records vs. common opponents, etc.
 
Depends on who they lose to compared to the other teams. And it depends on who they beat, the sec bias is out of control but who you win and lose to matters.

We got in the playoffs last year because we beat notre dame, we lost close games to 8-4 Louisville and 9-3 smu. If we lost to worse teams we wouldn’t have made it
 
Back
Top