- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 53,612
I just appreciate consistency as wellI agree. There are two different scenarios:
1) The receiver is slowing down as he gets out of bounds, and the play is over without a tackle is being made. The defender then tackles the receiver and draws the penalty.
2) The receiver did NOT slow down as he got out of bounds, and therefore, in the minds of the players, the play was not over without a tackle being made as they did not know if they were out of bounds. Although the defender tackled the receiver out of bounds, a penalty is not drawn.
Explanation: Both the defender AND the receiver were battling the whole game, giving it their all, and neither were letting up. Neither was looking at the ground, although they obviously could see they were at the sideline, they probably did not know where the exact line was. Neither was slowing down, and the defender then tackled him as hard as he could. This context is important because it signals the defender's vision and intent to do / not do harm to the receiver, which is the whole point of the rule. The rule was created to prevent a defenseless receiver from getting hurt. But if they were battling the entire time, and it was part of the play, then he was not defenseless.
Whether it’s football refs or baseball umpires there should be conversations before and during the games and the refs should stick to the same set of rules for both teams
As long as they do that I can handle it
Hasn’t felt that way this year at times