That was 18 years ago. He would have been one today.Ed Reed wouldn't be considered a blue chip prospect. Therefore this argument is invalid.
That was 18 years ago. He would have been one today.Ed Reed wouldn't be considered a blue chip prospect. Therefore this argument is invalid.
Thats one thing Butch Davis was good at, finding Talent... he would grab a 2-3 star from South Florida over a 5 star f3om Texas because he could develop them.... most Texas recruits had the facilities in high school to already reach their goal or potential.... but that skinny 3 star with blazing speed and good skills
We lost to FSU because of talent, sorry. Ramsey, Winston, Cook were the difference.You're forgetting the part about South Florida kids ROUTINELY out performing their recruiting ranking. I'm not going into the list, because you already know the examples.
The reality is that we, with like 2 or 3 bounces in our direction, had FSU dead to rights this year. We didn't lose because of talent.
We didn't lose to Louisiville, Nebraska, GT, etc because of talent.
We probably aren't talented enough to run the table, which you have to do out of the ACC to win a national title.
But we have enough talent to be in the Top 10 conversation. Ole Miss is not more talented than us. TCU is not more talented than us. Michigan State is not more talented than us.
And we would only strengthen our position if a greater percentage of the "head nodder" class filler kids we took were the underrated South Florida / State of Miami kids like Tony Jones...
I'm not saying we are not under performing based on our talent. Just saying that it's not good enough.
Most are not true blue-chip's. Al is a 2-star coach.We lost to FSU because of talent, sorry. Ramsey, Winston, Cook were the difference.You're forgetting the part about South Florida kids ROUTINELY out performing their recruiting ranking. I'm not going into the list, because you already know the examples.
The reality is that we, with like 2 or 3 bounces in our direction, had FSU dead to rights this year. We didn't lose because of talent.
We didn't lose to Louisiville, Nebraska, GT, etc because of talent.
We probably aren't talented enough to run the table, which you have to do out of the ACC to win a national title.
But we have enough talent to be in the Top 10 conversation. Ole Miss is not more talented than us. TCU is not more talented than us. Michigan State is not more talented than us.
And we would only strengthen our position if a greater percentage of the "head nodder" class filler kids we took were the underrated South Florida / State of Miami kids like Tony Jones...
I'm not saying we are not under performing based on our talent. Just saying that it's not good enough.
Well, 5 of the teams we lost to sure didn't have a problem overcoming our superior blue chippers.
All this little exercise has done is simply prove our coaches really really do suck.
YepAll this little exercise has done is simply prove our coaches really really do suck.
Yeah I'm not sure what the OP is going for here.
That Al sucks as a coach and recruiter? If so, then he is spot on
Blue-chip recruitsDo we have the #s on the other teams in the ACC? On its face the argument is good: talent is probably as good a predictor of success as anything But you also have to acknowledge that history doesn't always predict the future. Also, citing Ed Reed and other outliers isn't particularly informative because things tend to regress to the mean: for every diamond in the rough you have a 5* bust so your average talent is a pretty good indicator.
I spent a fair amount of time looking at f/+ ratings for a pick 'em league I was in. Those rate teams based on statistics that have the strongest correlation to success. They are good directionally but not so good I would put serious money on them. Same with talent. Stars, these days, are a very good proxy for team ability but not definitive.
I don't think anyone actually believes any coach in college football would have taken our team to a national championship, but there is definitely a range of expectation based on our talent level and we were at the very bottom of that range. Would be interesting to see where others finished based on their talent.
Exactlyif you can't get a top class in ****ing south florida then you can't recruit period
Most are not true blue-chip's. Al is a 2-star coach.We lost to FSU because of talent, sorry. Ramsey, Winston, Cook were the difference.You're forgetting the part about South Florida kids ROUTINELY out performing their recruiting ranking. I'm not going into the list, because you already know the examples.
The reality is that we, with like 2 or 3 bounces in our direction, had FSU dead to rights this year. We didn't lose because of talent.
We didn't lose to Louisiville, Nebraska, GT, etc because of talent.
We probably aren't talented enough to run the table, which you have to do out of the ACC to win a national title.
But we have enough talent to be in the Top 10 conversation. Ole Miss is not more talented than us. TCU is not more talented than us. Michigan State is not more talented than us.
And we would only strengthen our position if a greater percentage of the "head nodder" class filler kids we took were the underrated South Florida / State of Miami kids like Tony Jones...
I'm not saying we are not under performing based on our talent. Just saying that it's not good enough.
Well, 5 of the teams we lost to sure didn't have a problem overcoming our superior blue chippers.
Al's a fake coach. Why would he be able to get real blue-chip's? You're right, I did give him too much credit.Most are not true blue-chip's. Al is a 2-star coach.We lost to FSU because of talent, sorry. Ramsey, Winston, Cook were the difference.You're forgetting the part about South Florida kids ROUTINELY out performing their recruiting ranking. I'm not going into the list, because you already know the examples.
The reality is that we, with like 2 or 3 bounces in our direction, had FSU dead to rights this year. We didn't lose because of talent.
We didn't lose to Louisiville, Nebraska, GT, etc because of talent.
We probably aren't talented enough to run the table, which you have to do out of the ACC to win a national title.
But we have enough talent to be in the Top 10 conversation. Ole Miss is not more talented than us. TCU is not more talented than us. Michigan State is not more talented than us.
And we would only strengthen our position if a greater percentage of the "head nodder" class filler kids we took were the underrated South Florida / State of Miami kids like Tony Jones...
I'm not saying we are not under performing based on our talent. Just saying that it's not good enough.
Well, 5 of the teams we lost to sure didn't have a problem overcoming our superior blue chippers.
Can't have it both ways though...our blue chippers can't be fake blue chippers and everyone else's are true blue chipper. Also, Al is a no-star coach. You're giving him way too much credit.
I don't think its necessarily that we are missing blue-chip prospects, but rather Golden has kicked off something like 20 of his own recruits off his team since he's been here. Some of that was necessary especially in the case of the LBs this offseason, but with some of the other kids, I think he was too harsh. To me getting busted for pot like in the case of Gabe Terry does not constitute getting kicked off the team. AQM suspended for a WHOLE YEAR for a fight with his roommate. Who in college didn't get in a fight with their roommate at some point? Al probably doesn't want to fire D'No because he knows he dismissed half of D'No's players..