Disgusting discussion on Gameday today

Advertisement
Total bs. And on another note. College gameday shouldn’t be talking sports politics. Leave that to the other weekday shows. Talk football and feel good stories and interviews with the coaches and players. That’s it. That show has gone downhill
Herbie went down the road with politics when he the bashed UM administration a few years ago. Inflated egos and now Saban will be on weekly pushing the SEC at every turn.

Also, when you hire the McAfee’s of the world you’ve lost credibility. He sounds like he’s drunk as usual.
 
The crew basically spit the NCAA company line on the House Settlement. Nick Saban, the biggest cheater in history and close friend of former NCAA President Mark Emmert, said there should be a cap on revenue sharing and an NCAA clearinghouse to make sure NIL deals are fair market value.

Here’s the truth about the settlement: the players are going to make less money than they do now, and an incompetent, corrupt NCAA bureaucracy is going to grow larger and more powerful.

Does anybody think the NCAA knows anything about “fair market value?” They are as efficient and impressive as the local DMV. They’re historically corrupt and criminal. Why are we giving them more regulatory power and responsibility?

There can be no limit on NIL. It’s illegal and will get destroyed in Court. The only way this gets through is if the propaganda campaign and lobbyist money influences Capitol Hill. Anybody with a voice needs to expose this scam.
Good luck with that last paragraph in today's mostly corrupt system in every crevice of government now. I agree, NIL is every citizens right, untouchable. With that, I will avoid this thread now.
 
It’s not school money. That would be like capping the money Travis Kelce can get from Bud Light.

There is a dotted line bw the school and and collectives. Also, retail companies are not paying these kids (much)
 
Those changes would be illegal.

I think they will tie the revenue sharing money to binding contracts that make it harder to transfer.
and thats the fix thats needed. NIL is not the problem, its being able to transfer at will anytime you want. **** you could make it so players have to stay at a school for 2 years before they can transfer unless they are graduating.
 
The crew basically spit the NCAA company line on the House Settlement. Nick Saban, the biggest cheater in history and close friend of former NCAA President Mark Emmert, said there should be a cap on revenue sharing and an NCAA clearinghouse to make sure NIL deals are fair market value.

Here’s the truth about the settlement: the players are going to make less money than they do now, and an incompetent, corrupt NCAA bureaucracy is going to grow larger and more powerful.

Does anybody think the NCAA knows anything about “fair market value?” They are as efficient and impressive as the local DMV. They’re historically corrupt and criminal. Why are we giving them more regulatory power and responsibility?

There can be no limit on NIL. It’s illegal and will get destroyed in Court. The only way this gets through is if the propaganda campaign and lobbyist money influences Capitol Hill. Anybody with a voice needs to expose this scam.
ESPN loves two things, Saban and Lebron and their network has been built about creating inflated legacies around them.
Talk to anyone who was recruited by bama the stuff they got away with. im so sick of this saban on his high horse crap.
 
The crew basically spit the NCAA company line on the House Settlement. Nick Saban, the biggest cheater in history and close friend of former NCAA President Mark Emmert, said there should be a cap on revenue sharing and an NCAA clearinghouse to make sure NIL deals are fair market value.

Here’s the truth about the settlement: the players are going to make less money than they do now, and an incompetent, corrupt NCAA bureaucracy is going to grow larger and more powerful.

Does anybody think the NCAA knows anything about “fair market value?” They are as efficient and impressive as the local DMV. They’re historically corrupt and criminal. Why are we giving them more regulatory power and responsibility?

There can be no limit on NIL. It’s illegal and will get destroyed in Court. The only way this gets through is if the propaganda campaign and lobbyist money influences Capitol Hill. Anybody with a voice needs to expose this scam.
There would be senate hearings if a Miami head coach had a car dealership driven by his players
 
Advertisement
The crew basically spit the NCAA company line on the House Settlement. Nick Saban, the biggest cheater in history and close friend of former NCAA President Mark Emmert, said there should be a cap on revenue sharing and an NCAA clearinghouse to make sure NIL deals are fair market value.

Here’s the truth about the settlement: the players are going to make less money than they do now, and an incompetent, corrupt NCAA bureaucracy is going to grow larger and more powerful.

Does anybody think the NCAA knows anything about “fair market value?” They are as efficient and impressive as the local DMV. They’re historically corrupt and criminal. Why are we giving them more regulatory power and responsibility?

There can be no limit on NIL. It’s illegal and will get destroyed in Court. The only way this gets through is if the propaganda campaign and lobbyist money influences Capitol Hill. Anybody with a voice needs to expose this scam.
Surprising that a group of Americans would be split down the middle on of they want more government or less government.
 
If you’re looking at this as a sport. There is no sport in the world where you can change teams 8 times in 4 years.

I personally believe they should go back to a player having to sit out a year if they transfer. This would calm down the poaching of players. There should be emphasis placed on recruiting and choosing a school. There are zero consequences for players now.

I’m all for them making all the money they can. But I hate how a school like Pitt can recruit a player like Addison and develop him and then he just goes to USC because they tamper behind the scenes.

I don’t know what the solution is, maybe 2 year “contacts” or something else.

That’s for the market to decide.

You don’t like a behavior from a vendor? Structure your agreement in such a manner that discourages that type of behavior. This is perfectly reasonable in an arms-length transaction.

Your example about Pitt is an organization issue. You’re expecting him to leave? Figure out a way to keep him.

All of what you’re saying is what smaller market/college town teams are crying about; ESPECIALLY in the SEC SEC SEC!

They know without the gray area, there’s no cheating allowed.
 
police anger GIF by South Park
 
Can Saban go die already? He's done enough to try and ruin the sport.
 
I agree there shouldn’t be a cap but there needs to be nil changes. The system is too broken when a player can transfer twice a year every year to whoever pays more.
Pate had the best setup so far when talking with Josh from Behind the U IMO.
 
Advertisement
Unfortunately this is America where everything is a scam. Market value ? schools are simply buying players which is nothing new. You will always have the deal on paper and the under the table deal.

I don’t like NIL I don’t like the portal without sitting a year. I don’t like the lack of player loyalty.
 
Show me one sport where the players aren’t on multi year contracts.
You got called out on a factually incorrect statement, and now you're trying to move the goalpoasts.

Regardless, it is not at all uncommon for players to move to multiple clubs in 4 years, even when they are on multi-year contracts. They get loaned, their buyout clause is triggered, they agree to sell/buy early by mutual consent. It happens all the time.

Enzo Fernandez was on contract with River Plate when he was loaned to Defensa y Justicia. River wanted him back before the end of the term of loan, and paid to do so. Benfica then triggered his buyout clause. He played only half a season before Chelsea triggered that buyout clause. All in under two years.

If you want the NCAA to legislate that signees have to honor a minimum two-year commitment, fine. I can see the merit in such an arrangement.

But this "every other sport has multi year contracts" is a poor argument, because those contracts so infrequently proceed to full term.
 
The change will work itself out naturally based on data. Not enough data on figures yet. Eventually after a decade you’ll have clear indicators on how much should be spent on what and it will even out. Just need a few more 6/7 figure busts
 
Back
Top